Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28680360›Full record

ArticleJournal of medical biochemistry2017

Oxidative Stress Markers in GnRH Agonist and Antagonist Protocols in IVF.

Lidija Tulić, Snežana Vidaković, Ivan Tulić, Marijana Ćurčić, Jelena Stojnić, Katarina Jeremić

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of medical biochemistry, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Lidija TulićDepartment of In Vitro Fertilization, Gynecology and Obstetrics Institute, Faculty of Medicine, University of Belgrade, Clinical Center of Serbia, Serbia.
Snežana VidakovićDepartment of In Vitro Fertilization, Gynecology and Obstetrics Institute, Faculty of Medicine, University of Belgrade, Clinical Center of Serbia, Serbia.
Ivan TulićDepartment of In Vitro Fertilization, Gynecology and Obstetrics Institute, Faculty of Medicine, University of Belgrade, Clinical Center of Serbia, Serbia.
Marijana ĆurčićDepartment of Toxicology »Academic Danilo Soldatović«, Faculty of Pharmacy, University of Belgrade, Serbia.
Jelena StojnićDepartment of In Vitro Fertilization, Gynecology and Obstetrics Institute, Faculty of Medicine, University of Belgrade, Clinical Center of Serbia, Serbia.
Katarina JeremićDepartment of In Vitro Fertilization, Gynecology and Obstetrics Institute, Faculty of Medicine, University of Belgrade, Clinical Center of Serbia, Serbia.
Institute of Endocrinology · CZUniversity of Belgrade · RS

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundOur aim was to study the effect of GnRH agonist and antagonist protocols of ovarian stimulation on oxidative stress parameters in serum and the influence of oxidative stress parameters change on the outcome of IVF cycles.

methodsThis prospective study included 82 patients who underwent IVF procedures. We determined SOD, MDA and SH groups in serum. Serum samples were obtained between the second and fourth day of the cycle and on the day of HCG administration during ovarian stimulation.

resultsPatients were divided into two groups depending on the protocol of stimulation. The mean total and mature oocytes number and number of fertilized oocytes were higher in GnRH agonist group. There was no significant difference in biochemical pregnancy, miscarriage and live-birth rate in both groups. Mean serum SOD was significantly lower, while mean serum MDA and SH groups were significantly higher after ovarian stimulation. Delivery rate was higher in patients without OS while miscarriage rate was higher in patients with OS.

conclusionsOur study confirmed that there is a difference in the concentration of oxidative stress parameters before and after ovarian stimulation. IVF outcome is better in patients without OS after ovarian stimulation. However, the protocol of ovarian stimulation is neither associated with a change in oxidative stress parameters nor with the outcome of ART procedures.

Indexed as

IVF outcomeoxidative stressstimulation protocols

Identifiers

PMID28680360
PMCPMC5471649
OpenAlexW2587368411

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.