Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28680348›Full record

ArticleJournal of medical biochemistry2017

Preanalytical Nonconformity Management Regarding Primary Tube Mixing in Brazil.

Gabriel Lima-Oliveira, Gian Cesare Guidi, Andre Valpassos Pacifici Guimaraes, Jose Abol Correa, Giuseppe Lippi

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of medical biochemistry, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
0.4field-weighted citation impact, top 31% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Gabriel Lima-OliveiraSection of Clinical Biochemistry, Department of Neurosciences, Biomedicine and Movement Sciences - University of Verona, Verona, Italy.
Gian Cesare GuidiSection of Clinical Biochemistry, Department of Neurosciences, Biomedicine and Movement Sciences - University of Verona, Verona, Italy.
Andre Valpassos Pacifici GuimaraesDICQ - National System of Accreditation, Brazilian Society of Clinical Analyses, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.
Jose Abol CorreaPNCQ - Brazilian National Program of Quality Control, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.
Giuseppe LippiSection of Clinical Biochemistry, Department of Neurosciences, Biomedicine and Movement Sciences - University of Verona, Verona, Italy.
National Institute of Quality · PEUniversity of Verona · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe multifaceted clinical laboratory process is divided in three essential phases: the preanalytical, analytical and postanalytical phase. Problems emerging from the preanalytical phase are responsible for more than 60% of laboratory errors. This report is aimed at highlighting and discussing nonconformity (e.g., nonstandardized procedures) in primary blood tube mixing immediately after blood collection by venipuncture with evacuated tube systems.

methodsFrom January 2015 to December 2015, fifty different laboratory quality managers from Brazil were contacted to request their internal audit reports on nonconformity regarding primary blood tube mixing immediately after blood collection by venipuncture performed using evacuated tube systems. RESULTS AND

conclusionsA minority of internal audits (i.e., 4%) concluded that evacuated blood tubes were not accurately mixed after collection, whereas more than half of them reported that evacuated blood tubes were vigorously mixed immediately after collection, thus magnifying the risk of producing spurious hemolysis. Despite the vast ma jority of centers declaring that evacuated blood tubes were mixed gently and carefully, the overall number of inversions was found to be different from that recommended by the manufacturer. Since the turbulence generated by the standard vacuum pressure inside the primary evacuated tubes seems to be sufficient for providing solubilization, mixing and stabilization between additives and blood during venipuncture, avoidance of primary tube mixing probably does not introduce a major bias in tests results and may not be considered a nonconformity during audits for accreditation.

Indexed as

accreditationblood specimen collectionphlebotomyqualityspecimen handling

Identifiers

PMID28680348
PMCPMC5471658
OpenAlexW2560006306

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.