Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28680199›Full record

ArticleIndian journal of nuclear medicine : IJNM : the official journal of the Society of Nuclear Medicine, India

Diagnostic Accuracy of Stress Myocardial Perfusion Imaging in Indian Diabetic Patients: A Single Centre Experience.

Deepa Kumar, Ravinder Singh Sethi, Sandeep Bansal, Padma A Namgyal, Aditi Khurana Sehgal, Tajamul Syed Malik

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Indian journal of nuclear medicine : IJNM : the official journal of the Society of Nuclear Medicine, India. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Deepa KumarDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, Vardhman Mahavir Medical College and Safdarjung Hospital, New Delhi, India.
Ravinder Singh SethiDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, Vardhman Mahavir Medical College and Safdarjung Hospital, New Delhi, India.
Sandeep BansalDepartment of Cardiology, Vardhman Mahavir Medical College and Safdarjung Hospital, New Delhi, India.
Padma A NamgyalDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, Vardhman Mahavir Medical College and Safdarjung Hospital, New Delhi, India.
Aditi Khurana SehgalDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, Vardhman Mahavir Medical College and Safdarjung Hospital, New Delhi, India.
Tajamul Syed MalikDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, Vardhman Mahavir Medical College and Safdarjung Hospital, New Delhi, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Diabetics have around 2-4 times increased risk of coronary artery disease(CAD) and it is the most important cause of mortality in these patients. This study was carried out to compare the sensitivity, specificity and accuracy of MPI-SPECT among diabetics and non-diabetics in the Indian population. MATERIAL AND

methodsThis retrospective study included 261 patients; 213 males and 48 females, with 75 diabetic and 186 non-diabetic patients. Only type II diabetics and non-diabetic patients were included in the study. Only patients who had coronary angiography (CAG) done within 6 months of the stress

resultsConsidering coronary angiography as gold standard with ≥ 50% coronary stenosis as a cut off criteria for significant stenosis the sensitivity and specificity respectively, of myocardial perfusion SPECT was 83% and 72% in diabetics and 81% and 69% in non-diabetic pateints (

conclusionSensitivity and specificity of

Indexed as

Coronary angiographycoronary artery diseasediabeticmyocardial perfusion SPECT

Identifiers

PMID28680199
PMCPMC5482011

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.