Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28680114›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2017

Genome-wide association study and genomic prediction in citrus: Potential of genomics-assisted breeding for fruit quality traits.

Mai F Minamikawa, Keisuke Nonaka, Eli Kaminuma, Hiromi Kajiya-Kanegae, Akio Onogi, Shingo Goto, Terutaka Yoshioka, Atsushi Imai, Hiroko Hamada, Takeshi Hayashi and 7 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 65 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
65citing papers in PubMed
12.1field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

65 citing papers in PubMed, 153 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Chromosome-scale genome assembly and genomic prediction of essential oil compounds in Atractylodes lancea for genomics-assisted breeding.DNA research : an international journal for rapid publication of reports on genes and genomes · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Phenotypic simulation for fruit-related traits in FMolecular genetics and genomics : MGG · 2025
    Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Genomic selection for crop improvement in fruits and vegetables: a systematic scoping review.Molecular breeding : new strategies in plant improvement · 2024
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. The Genetic Dissection of Nitrogen Use-Related Traits in Flax (International journal of molecular sciences · 2023
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

5 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

17 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Mai F MinamikawaLaboratory of Biometry and Bioinformatics, Department of Agricultural and Environmental Biology, Graduate School of Agricultural and Life Sciences, The University of Tokyo, 1-1-1 Yayoi, Bunkyo, Tokyo, 113-8657, Japan.
Keisuke NonakaInstitute of Fruit Tree and Tea Science, National Agriculture and Food Research Organization (NARO), 485-6 Okitsu Nakacho, Shimizu, Shizuoka, 424-0292, Japan.
Eli KaminumaGenome Informatics Laboratory, National Institute of Genetics, Research Organization of Information and Systems, 1111 Yata, Mishima, Shizuoka, 411-8540, Japan.
Hiromi Kajiya-KanegaeLaboratory of Biometry and Bioinformatics, Department of Agricultural and Environmental Biology, Graduate School of Agricultural and Life Sciences, The University of Tokyo, 1-1-1 Yayoi, Bunkyo, Tokyo, 113-8657, Japan.ORCID 0000-0002-5719-7559
Akio OnogiLaboratory of Biometry and Bioinformatics, Department of Agricultural and Environmental Biology, Graduate School of Agricultural and Life Sciences, The University of Tokyo, 1-1-1 Yayoi, Bunkyo, Tokyo, 113-8657, Japan.
Shingo GotoInstitute of Fruit Tree and Tea Science, National Agriculture and Food Research Organization (NARO), 485-6 Okitsu Nakacho, Shimizu, Shizuoka, 424-0292, Japan.
Terutaka YoshiokaInstitute of Fruit Tree and Tea Science, National Agriculture and Food Research Organization (NARO), 485-6 Okitsu Nakacho, Shimizu, Shizuoka, 424-0292, Japan.
Atsushi ImaiInstitute of Fruit Tree and Tea Science, NARO, 2-1 Fujimoto, Tsukuba, Ibaraki, 305-8605, Japan.
Hiroko HamadaInstitute of Fruit Tree and Tea Science, National Agriculture and Food Research Organization (NARO), 485-6 Okitsu Nakacho, Shimizu, Shizuoka, 424-0292, Japan.
Takeshi HayashiInstitute of Crop Science, NARO, 2-1-2 Kannondai, Tsukuba, Ibaraki, 305-8518, Japan.
Satomi MatsumotoInstitute of Crop Science, NARO, 1-2 Ohwashi, Tsukuba, Ibaraki, 305-8634, Japan.
Yuichi KatayoseInstitute of Crop Science, NARO, 1-2 Ohwashi, Tsukuba, Ibaraki, 305-8634, Japan.
Atsushi ToyodaComparative Genomics Laboratory, National Institute of Genetics, Research Organization of Information and Systems, 1111 Yata, Mishima, Shizuoka, 411-8540, Japan.ORCID 0000-0002-0728-7548
Asao FujiyamaAdvanced Genomics Center, National Institute of Genetics, Research Organization of Information and Systems, 1111 Yata, Mishima, Shizuoka, 411-8540, Japan.
Yasukazu NakamuraGenome Informatics Laboratory, National Institute of Genetics, Research Organization of Information and Systems, 1111 Yata, Mishima, Shizuoka, 411-8540, Japan.
Tokurou ShimizuInstitute of Fruit Tree and Tea Science, National Agriculture and Food Research Organization (NARO), 485-6 Okitsu Nakacho, Shimizu, Shizuoka, 424-0292, Japan.
Hiroyoshi IwataLaboratory of Biometry and Bioinformatics, Department of Agricultural and Environmental Biology, Graduate School of Agricultural and Life Sciences, The University of Tokyo, 1-1-1 Yayoi, Bunkyo, Tokyo, 113-8657, Japan. aiwata@mail.ecc.u-tokyo.ac.jp.
National Agriculture and Food Research Organization · JPNational Institute of Genetics · JPThe University of Tokyo · JPInstitute of Crop Science · JPInstitute of Fruit Tree and Tea Science · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Novel genomics-based approaches such as genome-wide association studies (GWAS) and genomic selection (GS) are expected to be useful in fruit tree breeding, which requires much time from the cross to the release of a cultivar because of the long generation time. In this study, a citrus parental population (111 varieties) and a breeding population (676 individuals from 35 full-sib families) were genotyped for 1,841 single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) and phenotyped for 17 fruit quality traits. GWAS power and prediction accuracy were increased by combining the parental and breeding populations. A multi-kernel model considering both additive and dominance effects improved prediction accuracy for acidity and juiciness, implying that the effects of both types are important for these traits. Genomic best linear unbiased prediction (GBLUP) with linear ridge kernel regression (RR) was more robust and accurate than GBLUP with non-linear Gaussian kernel regression (GAUSS) in the tails of the phenotypic distribution. The results of this study suggest that both GWAS and GS are effective for genetic improvement of citrus fruit traits. Furthermore, the data collected from breeding populations are beneficial for increasing the detection power of GWAS and the prediction accuracy of GS.

Indexed as

Quantitative Trait LociCitrusGenome, PlantGenome-Wide Association StudyGenomicsModels, GeneticPhenotypePlant BreedingPolymorphism, Single NucleotideSelection, GeneticSequence Analysis, DNA

Identifiers

PMID28680114
PMCPMC5498537
OpenAlexW2728285811

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.