Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28680099›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2017

Transcranial random noise stimulation and cognitive training to improve learning and cognition of the atypically developing brain: A pilot study.

Chung Yen Looi, Jenny Lim, Francesco Sella, Simon Lolliot, Mihaela Duta, Alexander Alexandrovich Avramenko, Roi Cohen Kadosh

2 registry-linked trialsAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 28 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
28citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04242680 naunknown statusnot on this mapstarted 2019, after this paper: background citation

Improving Math Deficits in Children With Dyscalculia by tRNS: a Randomized, Double-blind Study

TypeinterventionalSponsorBambino Gesù Hospital and Research InstituteRan2019 to 2024Enrolled102ConditionsDevelopmental DyscalculiaArmsBrainstim DLPFC, Brainstim PPC, Brainstim Sham, Cognitive Training
NCT05832060 naunknown statusnot on this mapstarted 2023, after this paper: background citation

Comparing the Efficacy of tDCS and tRNS to Improve Reading Skills in Children and Adolescents With Dyslexia

TypeinterventionalSponsorBambino Gesù Hospital and Research InstituteRan2023 to 2025Enrolled24ConditionsDevelopmental DyslexiaArmsActive tDCS, Active tRNS, Sham tRNS or tDCS
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

28 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. tDCS and neurofeedback in ADHD treatment.Frontiers in systems neuroscience · 2025
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Non-invasive brain stimulation and neuroenhancement.Clinical neurophysiology practice · 2022
    Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. [Review of cognitive enhancement techniques based on the combination of cognitive training and transcranial direct current stimulation].Sheng wu yi xue gong cheng xue za zhi = Journal of biomedical engineering = Shengwu yixue gongchengxue zazhi · 2020
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Chung Yen LooiDepartment of Experimental Psychology, University of Oxford, Oxford, OX1 3UD, United Kingdom.
Jenny LimFairley House School, London, SW1P 4AU, UK.
Francesco SellaDepartment of Experimental Psychology, University of Oxford, Oxford, OX1 3UD, United Kingdom.
Simon LolliotDepartment of Experimental Psychology, University of Oxford, Oxford, OX1 3UD, United Kingdom.
Mihaela DutaDepartment of Experimental Psychology, University of Oxford, Oxford, OX1 3UD, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-0435-571X
Alexander Alexandrovich AvramenkoCavendish Laboratory, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, CB3 0HE, UK.
Roi Cohen KadoshDepartment of Experimental Psychology, University of Oxford, Oxford, OX1 3UD, United Kingdom. roi.cohenkadosh@psy.ox.ac.uk.ORCID 0000-0002-5564-5469

Funding

Wellcome Trust
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Learning disabilities that affect about 10% of human population are linked to atypical neurodevelopment, but predominantly treated by behavioural interventions. Behavioural interventions alone have shown little efficacy, indicating limited success in modulating neuroplasticity, especially in brains with neural atypicalities. Even in healthy adults, weeks of cognitive training alone led to inconsistent generalisable training gains, or "transfer effects" to non-trained materials. Meanwhile, transcranial random noise stimulation (tRNS), a painless and more direct neuromodulation method was shown to further promote cognitive training and transfer effects in healthy adults without harmful effects. It is unknown whether tRNS on the atypically developing brain might promote greater learning and transfer outcomes than training alone. Here, we show that tRNS over the bilateral dorsolateral prefrontal cortices (dlPFCs) improved learning and performance of children with mathematical learning disabilities (MLD) during arithmetic training compared to those who received sham (placebo) tRNS. Training gains correlated positively with improvement on a standardized mathematical diagnostic test, and this effect was strengthened by tRNS. These findings mirror those in healthy adults, and encourage replications using larger cohorts. Overall, this study offers insights into the concept of combining tRNS and cognitive training for improving learning and cognition of children with learning disabilities.

Indexed as

AdultChildCognitionCognitive Behavioral TherapyFemaleHumansLearning DisabilitiesMaleMathematical ConceptsMemory, Short-TermPilot ProjectsReaction TimeTranscranial Direct Current Stimulation

Identifiers

PMID28680099
PMCPMC5498607

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.