ArticleScientific reports2017
Prediction of Chromatin Accessibility in Gene-Regulatory Regions from Transcriptomics Data.
Article in Scientific reports, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- GECSI: Large-scale chromatin state imputation from gene expression.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025Article
- Learning Enhancer-Gene associations from Bulk Transcriptomic and Epigenetic Sequencing Data with STITCHIT.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2025Article
- Chromatin dynamics associated with seed desiccation tolerance/sensitivity at early germination inFrontiers in plant science · 2022Article
- A comprehensive review of computational prediction of genome-wide features.Briefings in bioinformatics · 2020Article
- ATACgraph: Profiling Genome-Wide Chromatin Accessibility From ATAC-seq.Frontiers in genetics · 2020Article
- Peripheral transcriptomic biomarkers for early detection of sporadic Alzheimer disease?Dialogues in clinical neuroscience · 2018Review
- Formaldehyde-assisted Isolation of Regulatory Elements to Measure Chromatin Accessibility in Mammalian Cells.Journal of visualized experiments : JoVE · 2018Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The epigenetics landscape of cells plays a key role in the establishment of cell-type specific gene expression programs characteristic of different cellular phenotypes. Different experimental procedures have been developed to obtain insights into the accessible chromatin landscape including DNase-seq, FAIRE-seq and ATAC-seq. However, current downstream computational tools fail to reliably determine regulatory region accessibility from the analysis of these experimental data. In particular, currently available peak calling algorithms are very sensitive to their parameter settings and show highly heterogeneous results, which hampers a trustworthy identification of accessible chromatin regions. Here, we present a novel method that predicts accessible and, more importantly, inaccessible gene-regulatory chromatin regions solely relying on transcriptomics data, which complements and improves the results of currently available computational methods for chromatin accessibility assays. We trained a hierarchical classification tree model on publicly available transcriptomics and DNase-seq data and assessed the predictive power of the model in six gold standard datasets. Our method increases precision and recall compared to traditional peak calling algorithms, while its usage is not limited to the prediction of accessible and inaccessible gene-regulatory chromatin regions, but constitutes a helpful tool for optimizing the parameter settings of peak calling methods in a cell type specific manner.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.