Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28679643›Full record

Trial reportThe oncologist2017

Endogenous Heat-Shock Protein Induction with or Without Radiofrequency Ablation or Cryoablation in Patients with Stage IV Melanoma.

Evidio Domingo-Musibay, James M Heun, Wendy K Nevala, Matthew Callstrom, Thomas Atwell, Evanthia Galanis, Lori A Erickson, Svetomir N Markovic

Open access · bronzeAbstract readClinical Trial, Phase IRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in The oncologist, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 34% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Interventional oncology update.European journal of radiology open · 2022
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Evidio Domingo-MusibayMayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA musib024@umn.edu.
James M HeunMayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA.
Wendy K NevalaMayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA.
Matthew CallstromMayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA.
Thomas AtwellMayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA.
Evanthia GalanisMayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA.
Lori A EricksonMayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA.
Svetomir N MarkovicMayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA.
Mayo Clinic · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

lessons learnedPercutaneous thermal ablation combined with in situ granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor cytokine therapy was technically feasible and well tolerated.No significant clinical or immunologic responses were seen.

backgroundMelanoma tumor-derived heat-shock proteins (HSPs) and HSP-peptide complexes can elicit protective antitumor responses. The granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor (GM-CSF) chemokine can also promote uptake and processing by professional antigen presenting cells (APCs). On this basis, we designed a pilot study of percutaneous thermal ablation as a means to induce heat-shock protein vaccination plus GM-CSF to determine safety and preliminary antitumor activity of this combination. MATERIALS AND

methodsThis study was designed to assess overall safety of percutaneous ablation combined with GM-CSF for unresectable, metastatic melanoma including uveal and mucosal types. All patients received heat-shock therapy (42°C for 30 minutes), then received one of three treatments: (a) intralesional GM-CSF (500 mcg standard dose); (b) radiofrequency ablation (RFA) + GM-CSF; or (c) cryoablation plus GM-CSF. The primary endpoint of the study was the induction of endogenous HSP70 and melanoma-specific cytotoxic T lymphocytes (CTL).

resultsNine patients (three per study arm) were enrolled. No dose-limiting toxicity was observed as specified per protocol. All patients developed progressive disease and went on to receive alternative therapy. Median overall survival (OS) was 8.2 months (95% confidence interval [CI] 2-17.2). The study was not powered to detect a difference in clinical outcome among treatment groups.

conclusionPercutaneous thermal ablation plus GM-CSF was well tolerated, technically feasible, and demonstrated an acceptable adverse event profile comparable to conventional RFA and cryoablation. While HSP70 was induced following therapy, the degree of HSP70 elevation was not associated with clinical outcome or induced CTL responses. While percutaneous thermal ablation plus GM-CSF combinations including checkpoint inhibitors could be considered in future studies, the use of GM-CSF remains experimental and for use in the context of clinical trials.

Indexed as

AgedAged, 80 and overCombined Modality TherapyCryosurgeryFeasibility StudiesFemaleGranulocyte-Macrophage Colony-Stimulating FactorHSP70 Heat-Shock ProteinsHumansHyperthermia, InducedImmunotherapyInjections, IntralesionalKaplan-Meier EstimateMaleMelanomaMiddle AgedGranulocyte-Macrophage Colony-Stimulating FactorHSP70 Heat-Shock Proteins

Identifiers

PMID28679643
PMCPMC5599201
OpenAlexW2734116565

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.