Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28679492›Full record

ArticleJMIR public health and surveillance2017

A Platform for Crowdsourced Foodborne Illness Surveillance: Description of Users and Reports.

Patrick Quade, Elaine Okanyene Nsoesie

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JMIR public health and surveillance, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Crowdsourced surveillance for neglected tropical diseases, Nigeria.Bulletin of the World Health Organization · 2025
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Emerging infectious diseases: prediction and detection.Canada communicable disease report = Releve des maladies transmissibles au Canada · 2017
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Patrick QuadeIwaspoisoned.com, New York, NY, United States.
Elaine Okanyene NsoesieInstitute for Health Metrics and Evaluation, University of Washington, Washington, WA, United States.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9170-8714

Funding

An Approach for Estimating Foodborne Illnesses and Assessing Risk FactorsR01LM011965 · NLM · BOSTON CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL · PI BROWNSTEIN, JOHN S., NSOESIE, ELAINE O. · 2015 to 2018
$1.4M
A Framework for Integrating Multiple Data Sources for Modeling and Forecasting of Infectious DiseasesK01ES025438 · NIEHS · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI NSOESIE, ELAINE O. · 2014 to 2016
$322k
NIEHS NIH HHS K01 ES025438NLM NIH HHS R01 LM011965
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundUnderreporting of foodborne illness makes foodborne disease burden estimation, timely outbreak detection, and evaluation of policies toward improving food safety challenging.

objectiveThe objective of this study was to present and evaluate Iwaspoisoned.com, an openly accessible Internet-based crowdsourcing platform that was launched in 2009 for the surveillance of foodborne illness. The goal of this system is to collect data that can be used to augment traditional approaches to foodborne disease surveillance.

methodsIndividuals affected by a foodborne illness can use this system to report their symptoms and the suspected location (eg, restaurant, hotel, hospital) of infection. We present descriptive statistics of users and businesses and highlight three instances where reports of foodborne illness were submitted before the outbreaks were officially confirmed by the local departments of health.

resultsMore than 49,000 reports of suspected foodborne illness have been submitted on Iwaspoisoned.com since its inception by individuals from 89 countries and every state in the United States. Approximately 95.51% (42,139/44,119) of complaints implicated restaurants as the source of illness. Furthermore, an estimated 67.55% (3118/4616) of users who responded to a demographic survey were between the ages of 18 and 34, and 60.14% (2776/4616) of the respondents were female. The platform is also currently used by health departments in 90% (45/50) of states in the US to supplement existing programs on foodborne illness reporting.

conclusionsCrowdsourced disease surveillance through systems such as Iwaspoisoned.com uses the influence and familiarity of social media to create an infrastructure for easy reporting and surveillance of suspected foodborne illness events. If combined with traditional surveillance approaches, these systems have the potential to lessen the problem of foodborne illness underreporting and aid in early detection and monitoring of foodborne disease outbreaks.

Indexed as

crowdsourced surveillancefoodborne diseasesfoodborne illness surveillancefood poisoninginfectious diseasesInternetmobileoutbreaksparticipatory epidemiologyparticipatory surveillance

Identifiers

PMID28679492
PMCPMC5517822

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.