Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28679399›Full record

ArticleGenome biology2017

Data normalization considerations for digital tumor dissection.

Aaron M Newman, Andrew J Gentles, Chih Long Liu, Maximilian Diehn, Ash A Alizadeh

Abstract readComment
In one paragraph

Article in Genome biology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Aaron M NewmanInstitute for Stem Cell Biology and Regenerative Medicine, Stanford University, Stanford, California, 94305, USA. amnewman@stanford.edu.
Andrew J GentlesCenter for Cancer Systems Biology, Stanford University, Stanford, California, 94305, USA.
Chih Long LiuInstitute for Stem Cell Biology and Regenerative Medicine, Stanford University, Stanford, California, 94305, USA.
Maximilian DiehnInstitute for Stem Cell Biology and Regenerative Medicine, Stanford University, Stanford, California, 94305, USA.
Ash A AlizadehInstitute for Stem Cell Biology and Regenerative Medicine, Stanford University, Stanford, California, 94305, USA. arasha@stanford.edu.

Funding

Translational Oncology Research Program (Project-005)P30CA124435 · NCI · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI Vittorio Sebastiano · 2007 to 2026
$71.4M
Modeling the Molecular Determinants of Induced Anti-Tumor Immune Responses in Mantle Cell LymphomaU01CA194389 · NCI · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI ALIZADEH, ASH ARASH, DAVIS, MARK MORRIS · 2015 to 2019
$3.1M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA124435NCI NIH HHS U01 CA194389
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In a recently published article in Genome Biology, Li and colleagues introduced TIMER, a gene expression deconvolution approach for studying tumor-infiltrating leukocytes (TILs) in 23 cancer types profiled by The Cancer Genome Atlas. Methods to characterize TIL biology are increasingly important, and the authors offer several arguments in favor of their strategy. Several of these claims warrant further discussion and highlight the critical importance of data normalization in gene expression deconvolution applications.Please see related Li et al correspondence: www.dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13059-017-1256-5 and Zheng correspondence: www.dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13059-017-1258-3.

Indexed as

Lymphocytes, Tumor-InfiltratingNeoplasmsHumans

Identifiers

PMID28679399
PMCPMC5498978

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.