ArticlePloS one2017
Hello handsome! Male's facial attractiveness gives rise to female's fairness bias in Ultimatum Game scenarios-An ERP study.
Article in PloS one, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
20 citing papers in PubMed.
- An event-related potential comparison of facial expression processing between cartoon and real faces.PloS one · 2019Trial
- The Influence of Facial Attractiveness and Advice Feedback on Advisors' Subsequent Willingness to Continue Giving Advice: Evidence from ERPs.Brain sciences · 2026Article
- Characterizing Ultimatum Game responders: a scoping review of factors that influence decision-making through an evolutionary lens.Frontiers in psychology · 2026Review
- Invisible and Visible Processing of Facial Attractiveness in Implicit Tasks: Evidence From Event-Related Potentials (ERPs).PsyCh journal · 2025Article
- Beauty and Social Interest Matter: Effects of Male's Facial Attractiveness, Vocal Attractiveness and Social Interest on Female's Decisions in Three-Person Games.Behavioral sciences (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Influence of male's facial attractiveness, vocal attractiveness and social interest on female's decisions of fairness.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Younger adults are more prosocial than older adults in economic decision making results from the give and take game.Heliyon · 2023Article
- Neural Mechanisms of the Conscious and Subliminal Processing of Facial Attractiveness.Brain sciences · 2023Article
- The Role of Sex in the Effect of Vocal Attractiveness on Ultimatum Game Decisions.Behavioral sciences (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Which is More Important, Proposer Identity or Allocation Motive? Event-Related Potential in Economic Decision-Making.Psychology research and behavior management · 2023Article
- Mate preference and brain oscillations: Initial romantic attraction is associated with decreases in alpha- and lower beta-band power.Human brain mapping · 2022Article
- You are excusable! Neural correlates of economic neediness on empathic concern and fairness perception.Cognitive, affective & behavioral neuroscience · 2022Article
- The "beauty premium" effect of voice attractiveness of long speech sounds in outcome-evaluation event-related potentials in a trust game.Frontiers in psychology · 2022Article
- Vocal Attractiveness Matters: Social Preferences in Cooperative Behavior.Frontiers in psychology · 2022Article
- The effect of attire attractiveness on students' perception of their teachers.Frontiers in psychology · 2022Article
- The Effect of Task Difficulty and Self-Contribution on Fairness Consideration: An Event-Related Potential Study.Frontiers in psychology · 2022Article
- The Effect of Reviewer Profile Photo on Purchase Decision: Evidence from Event-Related Potentials.Advances in cognitive psychology · 2021Article
- Confidence Modulates the Conformity Behavior of the Investors and Neural Responses of Social Influence in Crowdfunding.Frontiers in human neuroscience · 2021Article
- Roles of P300 and Late Positive Potential in Initial Romantic Attraction.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2021Article
- The semiotics of the message and the messenger: How nonverbal communication affects fairness perception.Cognitive, affective & behavioral neuroscience · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The current study delineated how male proposers' facial attractiveness affect female responders' fairness considerations and their subsequent decision outcome during the Ultimatum Game (UG). Event Related Potentials (ERPs) were recorded from 17 female subjects, who played the role as responders and had to decide whether to accept offers from either attractive or unattractive male proposers. Behavioral data (Acceptance Ratio and Response time) revealed that, more offers were accepted from attractive-face conditions; subjects typically responded quicker to unfair offers from unattractive proposers as compared with slower to unfair offers from attractive proposers. The ERP data demonstrated similar N2 amplitudes elicited by both attractive and unattractive faces, and a larger early frontal LPP elicited by the attractive faces compared with unattractive ones, but no significant differences of both late posterior LPP and typical parietal LPP amplitudes were observed between these two face conditions, which was different from our previous study with similar paradigm but male participants. The results suggest that, in comparison to males, females might not experience the potential attention bias towards unattractive opposite-sex faces and are less likely to possess an enhanced processing and evaluation of those faces. This phenomenon might be explained by endogenous gender differences in mate preference. The feedback-related negativity (FRN) and P300 responses during an offer presentation were further measured in both attractive-face and unattractive-face conditions and the results demonstrated that the amplitudes elicited by fair and unfair offers were not statistically different in the former condition, but were different in the latter condition. More specifically, unfair offers generated larger FRN and smaller P300 than fair ones in the unattractive-face condition. Findings suggest that, although females tend to possess less salient evaluation of male's facial attractiveness, the attractiveness of male proposers would still attenuate female responders' fairness consideration during the UG.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.