Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28678871›Full record

ArticlePloS one2017

The effect of infectious dose on humoral and cellular immune responses in Chlamydophila caviae primary ocular infection.

Ana Filipovic, Ehsan Ghasemian, Aleksandra Inic-Kanada, Ivana Lukic, Elisabeth Stein, Emilija Marinkovic, Radmila Djokic, Dejana Kosanovic, Nadine Schuerer, Hadeel Chalabi and 3 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 31% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Effects of iota-carrageenan on ocularJournal of applied phycology · 2018
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Ana FilipovicDepartment of Research and Development, Institute of Virology, Vaccines and Sera - TORLAK, Belgrade, Serbia.
Ehsan GhasemianOCUVAC - Center of Ocular Inflammation and Infection, Laura Bassi Centres of Expertise, Center for Pathophysiology, Infectiology and Immunology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Aleksandra Inic-KanadaOCUVAC - Center of Ocular Inflammation and Infection, Laura Bassi Centres of Expertise, Center for Pathophysiology, Infectiology and Immunology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Ivana LukicDepartment of Research and Development, Institute of Virology, Vaccines and Sera - TORLAK, Belgrade, Serbia.
Elisabeth SteinOCUVAC - Center of Ocular Inflammation and Infection, Laura Bassi Centres of Expertise, Center for Pathophysiology, Infectiology and Immunology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Emilija MarinkovicDepartment of Research and Development, Institute of Virology, Vaccines and Sera - TORLAK, Belgrade, Serbia.
Radmila DjokicDepartment of Research and Development, Institute of Virology, Vaccines and Sera - TORLAK, Belgrade, Serbia.
Dejana KosanovicDepartment of Research and Development, Institute of Virology, Vaccines and Sera - TORLAK, Belgrade, Serbia.
Nadine SchuererOCUVAC - Center of Ocular Inflammation and Infection, Laura Bassi Centres of Expertise, Center for Pathophysiology, Infectiology and Immunology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Hadeel ChalabiOCUVAC - Center of Ocular Inflammation and Infection, Laura Bassi Centres of Expertise, Center for Pathophysiology, Infectiology and Immunology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Sandra Belij-RammerstorferOCUVAC - Center of Ocular Inflammation and Infection, Laura Bassi Centres of Expertise, Center for Pathophysiology, Infectiology and Immunology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Marijana StojanovicDepartment of Research and Development, Institute of Virology, Vaccines and Sera - TORLAK, Belgrade, Serbia.
Talin Barisani-AsenbauerOCUVAC - Center of Ocular Inflammation and Infection, Laura Bassi Centres of Expertise, Center for Pathophysiology, Infectiology and Immunology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8661-9183
Medical University of Vienna · ATInstitute of Virology, Vaccines and Sera “Torlak” · RS

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Following infection, the balance between protective immunity and immunopathology often depends on the initial infectious load. Several studies have investigated the effect of infectious dose; however, the mechanism by which infectious dose affects disease outcomes and the development of a protective immune response is not known. The aim of this study was to investigate how the infectious dose modulates the local and systemic humoral and the cellular immune responses during primary ocular chlamydial infection in the guinea pig animal model. Guinea pigs were infected by ocular instillation of a Chlamydophila caviae-containing eye solution in the conjunctival sac in three different doses: 1×102, 1×104, and 1×106 inclusion forming units (IFUs). Ocular pathology, chlamydial clearance, local and systemic C. caviae-specific humoral and cellular immune responses were assessed. All inocula of C. caviae significantly enhanced the local production of C. caviae-specific IgA in tears, but only guinea pigs infected with the higher doses showed significant changes in C. caviae-specific IgA levels in vaginal washes and serum. On complete resolution of infection, the low dose of C. caviae did not alter the ratio of CD4+ and CD8+ cells within guinea pigs' submandibular lymph node (SMLN) lymphocytes while the higher doses increased the percentages of CD4+ and CD8+ cells within the SMLN lymphocytes. A significant negative correlation between pathology intensity and the percentage of CD4+ and CD8+ cells within SMLN lymphocyte pool at selected time points post-infection was recorded for both 1×104, and 1×106 IFU infected guinea pigs. The relevance of the observed dose-dependent differences on the immune response should be further investigated in repeated ocular chlamydial infections.

Indexed as

ChlamydophilaImmunity, CellularImmunity, HumoralAnimalsChlamydophila InfectionsDose-Response Relationship, ImmunologicEye InfectionsGuinea PigsVirulence

Identifiers

PMID28678871
PMCPMC5498042
OpenAlexW2732484414

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.