ArticlePloS one2017
Adverse events in deep brain stimulation: A retrospective long-term analysis of neurological, psychiatric and other occurrences.
Article in PloS one, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 72 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
72 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 155 citations in OpenAlex.
- Deep brain stimulation for obsessive-compulsive-disorder: a systematic review and meta-analysis of individual participant outcome data from sham-controlled trials.Molecular psychiatry · 2025Pooled it
- Evidence-Based Guidelines and Secondary Meta-Analysis for the Use of Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation in Neurological and Psychiatric Disorders.The international journal of neuropsychopharmacology · 2021Pooled it
- Association of Subthalamic Deep Brain Stimulation With Motor, Functional, and Pharmacologic Outcomes in Patients With Monogenic Parkinson Disease: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.JAMA network open · 2019Pooled it
- Pooled it
- Awakening: Predicting external stimulation to force transitions between different brain states.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2019Trial
- Psychotic Symptoms Following Subthalamic DBS in Parkinson's Disease: Three Clinical Cases and Literature Review.Clinical case reports · 2026Article
- The optimization of neuroprosthetic interfaces relying on biophysical and surrogate digital twins.npj biomedical innovations · 2026Review
- Ethical Guidance for Investigational Implantable Neural Device Studies: Recommendations for Researchers and Research Ethics Committees.Neuromodulation : journal of the International Neuromodulation Society · 2026Review
- Deep Brain Stimulation for Movement Disorders in Spain: Temporal Trends, Complications, and Sex-Related Disparities (2002-2019).Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Safety of Intracranial Neuromodulation in Drug-Resistant Pediatric and Adult Epilepsy.Neurology · 2026Article
- Case Report: Deep brain stimulation in SYNJ1-related early-onset parkinsonism.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Article
- Preoperative Functional Connectivity Predicts Antiparkinson Drug Change after Deep Brain Stimulation.Movement disorders : official journal of the Movement Disorder Society · 2026Article
- An L-shaped flexible neural implant for chronic ECoG signal acquisition in M2 region of control and Parkinsonian rat models.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Intraputaminal Delivery of Adeno-Associated Virus Serotype 2-Glial Cell Line-Derived Neurotrophic Factor in Mild or Moderate Parkinson's Disease.Movement disorders : official journal of the Movement Disorder Society · 2025Article
- Boundary complexity of cortical and subcortical areas predicts deep brain stimulation outcomes in Parkinson's disease.Nature communications · 2025Article
- Individualising Galvanic Vestibular Stimulation Further Improves Visuomotor Performance in Parkinson's Disease.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Deep Brain Stimulation and Brain-Spine Interface for Functional Restoration in Spinal Cord Injury.Biomedicines · 2025Review
- Recommendations for the Safe Application of Temporal Interference Stimulation in the Human Brain Part I: Principles of Electrical Neuromodulation and Adverse Effects.Bioelectromagnetics · 2025Review
- Gerstmann Syndrome: What is the Possible Role of Deep Brain Stimulation?Neurocritical care · 2025Review
- Gait and balance worsening after bilateral deep brain stimulation of the subthalamic nucleus (STN-DBS) for Parkinson's disease: a systematic review.BMJ neurology open · 2025Article
12 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
19 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND
objectiveThe extent to which deep brain stimulation (DBS) can improve quality of life may be perceived as a permanent trade-off between neurological improvements and complications of therapy, comorbidities, and disease progression. PATIENTS AND
methodsWe retrospectively investigated 123 consecutive and non-preselected patients. Indications for DBS surgery were Parkinson's disease (82), dystonia (18), tremor of different etiology (21), Huntington's disease (1) and Gilles de la Tourette syndrome (1). AEs were defined as any untoward clinical occurrence, sign or patient complaint or unintended disease if related or unrelated to the surgical procedures, implanted devices or ongoing DBS therapy.
resultsOver a mean/median follow-up period of 4.7 years (578 patient-years) 433 AEs were recorded in 106 of 123 patients (86.2%). There was no mortality or persistent morbidity from the surgical procedure. All serious adverse events (SAEs) that occurred within 4 weeks of surgery were reversible. Neurological AEs (193 in 85 patients) and psychiatric AEs (78 in 48 patients) were documented most frequently. AEs in 4 patients (suicide under GPI stimulation, weight gain >20 kg, impairment of gait and speech, cognitive decline >2 years following surgery) were severe or worse, at least possibly related to DBS and non reversible. In PD 23.1% of the STN-stimulated patients experienced non-reversible (or unknown reversibility) AEs that were at least possibly related to DBS in the form of impaired speech or gait, depression, weight gain, cognitive disturbances or urinary incontinence (severity was mild or moderate in 15 of 18 patients). Age and Hoehn&Yahr stage of STN-simulated PD patients, but not preoperative motor impairment or response to levodopa, showed a weak correlation (r = 0.24 and 0.22, respectively) with the number of AEs.
conclusionsDBS-related AEs that were severe or worse and non-reversible were only observed in PD (4 of 82 patients; 4.9%), but not in other diseases. PD patients exhibited a significant risk for non-severe AEs most of which also represented preexisting and progressive axial and non-motor symptoms of PD. Mild gait and/or speech disturbances were rather frequent complaints under VIM stimulation. GPI stimulation for dystonia could be applied with negligible DBS-related side effects.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.