Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28678830›Full record

ArticlePloS one2017

Adverse events in deep brain stimulation: A retrospective long-term analysis of neurological, psychiatric and other occurrences.

Carsten Buhmann, Torge Huckhagel, Katja Engel, Alessandro Gulberti, Ute Hidding, Monika Poetter-Nerger, Ines Goerendt, Peter Ludewig, Hanna Braass, Chi-Un Choe and 9 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 72 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
72citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
10.4field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

72 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 155 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Awakening: Predicting external stimulation to force transitions between different brain states.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2019
    Trial
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Preoperative Functional Connectivity Predicts Antiparkinson Drug Change after Deep Brain Stimulation.Movement disorders : official journal of the Movement Disorder Society · 2026
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Article

12 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

19 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Carsten BuhmannKlinik für Neurologie, Universitätsklinikum Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.
Torge HuckhagelKlinik für Neurochirurgie, Universitätsklinikum Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.
Katja EngelKlinik für Neurochirurgie, Universitätsklinikum Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.
Alessandro GulbertiInstitut für Neurophysiologie und Pathophysiologie, Universitätsklinikum Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.
Ute HiddingKlinik für Neurologie, Universitätsklinikum Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.
Monika Poetter-NergerKlinik für Neurologie, Universitätsklinikum Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.
Ines GoerendtKlinik für Neurologie, Universitätsklinikum Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.
Peter LudewigKlinik für Neurologie, Universitätsklinikum Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.
Hanna BraassKlinik für Neurologie, Universitätsklinikum Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.
Chi-Un ChoeKlinik für Neurologie, Universitätsklinikum Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.
Kara KrajewskiKlinik für Neurochirurgie, Universitätsklinikum Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.
Christian OehlweinPraxis für Neurologie, Gera, Germany.
Katrin MittmannPraxis für Neurologie, Gera, Germany.
Andreas K EngelInstitut für Neurophysiologie und Pathophysiologie, Universitätsklinikum Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.
Christian GerloffKlinik für Neurologie, Universitätsklinikum Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.
Manfred WestphalKlinik für Neurochirurgie, Universitätsklinikum Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.
Johannes A KöppenKlinik für Neurochirurgie, Universitätsklinikum Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.
Christian K E MollInstitut für Neurophysiologie und Pathophysiologie, Universitätsklinikum Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.
Wolfgang HamelKlinik für Neurochirurgie, Universitätsklinikum Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.
University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf · DEKlinik und Poliklinik für Neurologie · DEUniversität Hamburg · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND

objectiveThe extent to which deep brain stimulation (DBS) can improve quality of life may be perceived as a permanent trade-off between neurological improvements and complications of therapy, comorbidities, and disease progression. PATIENTS AND

methodsWe retrospectively investigated 123 consecutive and non-preselected patients. Indications for DBS surgery were Parkinson's disease (82), dystonia (18), tremor of different etiology (21), Huntington's disease (1) and Gilles de la Tourette syndrome (1). AEs were defined as any untoward clinical occurrence, sign or patient complaint or unintended disease if related or unrelated to the surgical procedures, implanted devices or ongoing DBS therapy.

resultsOver a mean/median follow-up period of 4.7 years (578 patient-years) 433 AEs were recorded in 106 of 123 patients (86.2%). There was no mortality or persistent morbidity from the surgical procedure. All serious adverse events (SAEs) that occurred within 4 weeks of surgery were reversible. Neurological AEs (193 in 85 patients) and psychiatric AEs (78 in 48 patients) were documented most frequently. AEs in 4 patients (suicide under GPI stimulation, weight gain >20 kg, impairment of gait and speech, cognitive decline >2 years following surgery) were severe or worse, at least possibly related to DBS and non reversible. In PD 23.1% of the STN-stimulated patients experienced non-reversible (or unknown reversibility) AEs that were at least possibly related to DBS in the form of impaired speech or gait, depression, weight gain, cognitive disturbances or urinary incontinence (severity was mild or moderate in 15 of 18 patients). Age and Hoehn&Yahr stage of STN-simulated PD patients, but not preoperative motor impairment or response to levodopa, showed a weak correlation (r = 0.24 and 0.22, respectively) with the number of AEs.

conclusionsDBS-related AEs that were severe or worse and non-reversible were only observed in PD (4 of 82 patients; 4.9%), but not in other diseases. PD patients exhibited a significant risk for non-severe AEs most of which also represented preexisting and progressive axial and non-motor symptoms of PD. Mild gait and/or speech disturbances were rather frequent complaints under VIM stimulation. GPI stimulation for dystonia could be applied with negligible DBS-related side effects.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultAgedDeep Brain StimulationDystoniaFemaleFollow-Up StudiesGait Disorders, NeurologicHumansMaleMental DisordersMiddle AgedNervous System DiseasesOutcome Assessment, Health CareQuality of LifeRetrospective Studies

Identifiers

PMID28678830
PMCPMC5497949
OpenAlexW2731625451

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.