Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28678814›Full record

ArticlePLoS medicine2017

Long-term health status and trajectories of seriously injured patients: A population-based longitudinal study.

Belinda J Gabbe, Pam M Simpson, Peter A Cameron, Jennie Ponsford, Ronan A Lyons, Alex Collie, Mark Fitzgerald, Rodney Judson, Warwick J Teague, Sandra Braaf and 3 more

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLoS medicine, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06093074 (Self-management Program for Patients in the Sub-acute Phase After Moderate to Severe Traumatic Injury -a Feasibility Study), which is not on this map. Cited by 77 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
77citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
16.8field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06093074 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2023, after this paper: background citation

Self-management Program for Patients in the Sub-acute Phase After Moderate to Severe Traumatic Injury -a Feasibility Study

TypeinterventionalSponsorOslo University HospitalRan2023 to 2024Enrolled11ConditionsSelf-management, Feasibility Studies, Spinal Cord Injuries, Brain InjuriesArmsself-management program after traumatic injuries
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

77 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 195 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Return to work after major trauma: a systematic review.Scandinavian journal of trauma, resuscitation and emergency medicine · 2025
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Trial
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Physical functionality two years after major trauma: predictors from a single center cohort study.European journal of trauma and emergency surgery : official publication of the European Trauma Society · 2026
    Article
  9. Observational
  10. Article
  11. Observational
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Review

17 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 9 institutions in 3 countries.

Belinda J GabbeSchool of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7096-7688
Pam M SimpsonSchool of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7527-778X
Peter A CameronSchool of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Jennie PonsfordMonash-Epworth Rehabilitation Research Centre, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Ronan A LyonsSchool of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5225-000X
Alex CollieSchool of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2617-9339
Mark FitzgeraldTrauma Service, The Alfred, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0183-7761
Rodney JudsonTrauma Service, Royal Melbourne Hospital, Parkville, Victoria, Australia.
Warwick J TeagueTrauma Service, The Royal Children's Hospital, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4747-6025
Sandra BraafSchool of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Andrew NunnVictorian Spinal Cord Service, Austin Health, Heidelberg, Victoria, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0222-9410
Shanthi AmeratungaSection of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, School of Population Health, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8042-2251
James E HarrisonResearch Centre for Injury Studies, Flinders University, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9893-8491
Monash University · AUSwansea University · GBThe Alfred Hospital · AUAustin Health · AUEpworth Hospital · AUFlinders University · AURoyal Children's Hospital · AUThe Royal Melbourne Hospital · AUUniversity of Auckland · NZ

Funding

Medical Research Council MC_PC_13043
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundImproved understanding of the quality of survival of patients is crucial in evaluating trauma care, understanding recovery patterns and timeframes, and informing healthcare, social, and disability service provision. We aimed to describe the longer-term health status of seriously injured patients, identify predictors of outcome, and establish recovery trajectories by population characteristics. METHODS AND

findingsA population-based, prospective cohort study using the Victorian State Trauma Registry (VSTR) was undertaken. We followed up 2,757 adult patients, injured between July 2011 and June 2012, through deaths registry linkage and telephone interview at 6-, 12-, 24-, and 36-months postinjury. The 3-level EuroQol 5 dimensions questionnaire (EQ-5D-3L) was collected, and mixed-effects regression modelling was used to identify predictors of outcome, and recovery trajectories, for the EQ-5D-3L items and summary score. Mean (SD) age of participants was 50.8 (21.6) years, and 72% were male. Twelve percent (n = 333) died during their hospital stay, 8.1% (n = 222) of patients died postdischarge, and 155 (7.0%) were known to have survived to 36-months postinjury but were lost to follow-up at all time points. The prevalence of reporting problems at 36-months postinjury was 37% for mobility, 21% for self-care, 47% for usual activities, 50% for pain/discomfort, and 41% for anxiety/depression. Continued improvement to 36-months postinjury was only present for the usual activities item; the adjusted relative risk (ARR) of reporting problems decreased from 6 to 12 (ARR 0.87, 95% CI: 0.83-0.90), 12 to 24 (ARR 0.94, 95% CI: 0.90-0.98), and 24 to 36 months (ARR 0.95, 95% CI: 0.95-0.99). The risk of reporting problems with pain or discomfort increased from 24- to 36-months postinjury (ARR 1.06, 95% CI: 1.01, 1.12). While loss to follow-up was low, there was responder bias with patients injured in intentional events, younger, and less seriously injured patients less likely to participate; therefore, these patient subgroups were underrepresented in the study findings.

conclusionsThe prevalence of ongoing problems at 3-years postinjury is high, confirming that serious injury is frequently a chronic disorder. These findings have implications for trauma system design. Investment in interventions to reduce the longer-term impact of injuries is needed, and greater investment in primary prevention is needed.

Indexed as

Health StatusQuality of LifeAdolescentAdultAgedAged, 80 and overFemaleHumansLongitudinal StudiesMaleMiddle AgedProspective StudiesVictoriaWounds and InjuriesYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID28678814
PMCPMC5497942
OpenAlexW2730374777

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.