ArticlePloS one2017
Skin microbiota in frogs from the Brazilian Atlantic Forest: Species, forest type, and potential against pathogens.
Article in PloS one, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed.
- A new member of the novel, non-core Brucella clade: An exotic frog isolate closely related to atypical Brucella isolates from recent human brucellosis cases in Australia.BMC microbiology · 2025Article
- Potential Protective Role of Amphibian Skin Bacteria Against Water MoldJournal of fungi (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Amphibian tolerance to arsenic: microbiome-mediated insights.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Animal Microbiomes as a Source of Novel Antibiotic-Producing Strains.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023Review
- Host macrocyclic acylcarnitines mediate symbiotic interactions between frogs and their skin microbiome.iScience · 2023Article
- Exposure to Roundup and Antibiotics Alters Gut Microbial Communities, Growth, and Behavior inBiology · 2023Article
- Neotropical Frog Foam Nest's Microbiomes.Microorganisms · 2023Article
- Quantity and Quality of Aquaculture Enrichments Influence Disease Epidemics and Provide Ecological Alternatives to Antibiotics.Antibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Article
- Article
- Skin microbiome correlates with bioclimate and Batrachochytrium dendrobatidis infection intensity in Brazil's Atlantic Forest treefrogs.Scientific reports · 2020Article
- Environmental influences on and antimicrobial activity of the skin microbiota ofEcology and evolution · 2020Article
- Low-load pathogen spillover predicts shifts in skin microbiome and survival of a terrestrial-breeding amphibian.Proceedings. Biological sciences · 2019Article
- Testing skin swabbing for DNA sampling in dendrobatid frogs.Amphibia-reptilia : publication of the Societas Europaea Herpetologica · 2018Article
- Temporal Variation of the Skin Bacterial Community andFrontiers in microbiology · 2017Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The cutaneous microbiota of amphibians can be defined as a biological component of protection, since it can be composed of bacteria that produce antimicrobial compounds. Several factors influence skin microbial structure and it is possible that environmental variations are among one of these factors, perhaps through physical-chemical variations in the skin. This community, therefore, is likely modified in habitats in which some ecophysiological parameters are altered, as in fragmented forests. Our research goal was to compare the skin bacterial community of four anuran species of the Atlantic Forest of Brazil in landscapes from two different environments: continuous forest and fragmented forest. The guiding hypotheses were: 1) microbial communities of anuran skin vary among sympatric frog species of the Atlantic forest; 2) the degree to which forested areas are intact affects the cutaneous bacterial community of amphibians. If the external environment influences the skin microbiota, and if such influences affect microorganisms capable of inhibiting the colonization of pathogens, we expect consequences for the protection of host individuals. We compared bacterial communities based on richness and density of colony forming units; investigated the antimicrobial potential of isolated strains; and did the taxonomic identification of isolated morphotypes. We collected 188 individual frogs belonging to the species Proceratophrys boiei, Dendropsophus minutus, Aplastodiscus leucopygius and Phyllomedusa distincta, and isolated 221 bacterial morphotypes. Our results demonstrate variation in the skin microbiota of sympatric amphibians, but only one frog species exhibited differences in the bacterial communities between populations from fragmented and continuous forest. Therefore, the variation we observed is probably derived from both intrinsic aspects of the host amphibian species and extrinsic aspects of the environment occupied by the host. Finally, we detected antimicrobial activity in 27 morphotypes of bacteria isolated from all four amphibian species.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.