ArticlePLoS medicine2017
Major scientific lessons learned in the trauma field over the last two decades.
Article in PLoS medicine, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed.
- Next-generation blood products: Results of a survey on interest, indications, drivers, and barriers to adoption.Transfusion · 2026Article
- Cardiogenic Shock Systems of Care Best Practices. Part 2: The Shock Team and Inpatient Management.US cardiology · 2026Review
- The Joint Trauma System: A critical lifeline facing an uncertain future.The journal of trauma and acute care surgery · 2025Article
- Early Recognition and Risk Stratification in Cardiogenic Shock: Well Begun Is Half Done.Journal of clinical medicine · 2023Review
- Presence of Permanent Pacemakers: Implications for Elderly Patients Presenting with Traumatic Injuries.Trauma surgery & acute care open · 2023Article
- Multicentre observational study on practice of prehospital management of hypotensive trauma patients: the SPITFIRE study protocol.BMJ open · 2022Article
- The Role of the Inflammatory Response in Mediating Functional Recovery Following Composite Tissue Injuries.International journal of molecular sciences · 2021Review
- 'Combat' Approach to Cardiogenic Shock.Interventional cardiology (London, England) · 2018Review
- The new survivors and a new era for trauma research.PLoS medicine · 2017Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
John B Holcomb summarizes recent conceptual and practical advances in trauma care, in both military and civilian settings, and presents directions for future research.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.