Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28678703›Full record

ArticleIEEE transactions on medical imaging2018

Enforcing Co-Expression Within a Brain-Imaging Genomics Regression Framework.

Pascal Zille, Vince D Calhoun, Yu-Ping Wang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in IEEE transactions on medical imaging, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Multivariate Analysis and Modelling of multiple Brain endOphenotypes: Let's MAMBO!Computational and structural biotechnology journal · 2021
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Multimodal Sparse Classifier for Adolescent Brain Age Prediction.IEEE journal of biomedical and health informatics · 2020
    Article
  11. Brain Imaging Genomics: Integrated Analysis and Machine Learning.Proceedings of the IEEE. Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers · 2020
    Article
  12. Article
  13. [Progress in the study of the imaging genomics of Alzheimer's disease].Sheng wu yi xue gong cheng xue za zhi = Journal of biomedical engineering = Shengwu yixue gongchengxue zazhi · 2019
    Review
  14. Joint Sparse Collaborative Regression on Imaging Genetics Study of Schizophrenia.IEEE/ACM transactions on computational biology and bioinformatics
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Pascal Zille
Vince D Calhoun
Yu-Ping Wang

Funding

Trans-omics Integration of Multi-omics Studies for OsteoporosisU19AG055373 · NIA · TULANE UNIVERSITY OF LOUISIANA · PI Chuan Qiu · 2017 to 2026
$24.3M
Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation for Treatment of Auditory Verbal HalluciP20GM103472 · NIGMS · THE MIND RESEARCH NETWORK · PI BEDRICK, EDWARD J · 2012 to 2017
$14.3M
Multivariate methods for identifying multitask/multimodal brain imaging biomarkersR01EB006841 · NIBIB · THE MIND RESEARCH NETWORK · PI VINCE D CALHOUN, Sergey Plis · 2007 to 2026
$9.8M
Pilot Project Program (PPP)P30GM122734 · NIGMS · THE MIND RESEARCH NETWORK · PI MAYER, ANDREW ROBERT · 2018 to 2022
$7.0M
Unified multivariate data-driven solutions for static and dynamic brain connectivityR01EB020407 · NIBIB · THE MIND RESEARCH NETWORK · PI ADALI, TULAY, CALHOUN, VINCE D · 2015 to 2018
$2.7M
Integration of brain imaging with genomic and epigenomic dataR01MH104680 · NIMH · TULANE UNIVERSITY OF LOUISIANA · PI CALHOUN, VINCE D, DENG, HONG-WEN · 2014 to 2017
$2.1M
Integration of fMRI imaging, genomics, network and biological knowledgeR01MH107354 · NIMH · TULANE UNIVERSITY OF LOUISIANA · PI WANG, YU-PING · 2015 to 2018
$1.9M
Integration of multiscale genomic data for comprehensive analysis of complex diseR01GM109068 · NIGMS · TULANE UNIVERSITY OF LOUISIANA · PI WANG, YU-PING · 2014 to 2018
$1.6M
NIA NIH HHS U19 AG055373NIBIB NIH HHS R01 EB006841NIBIB NIH HHS R01 EB020407NIGMS NIH HHS P20 GM103472NIGMS NIH HHS P30 GM122734NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM109068NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH104680NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH107354
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Among the challenges arising in brain imaging genetic studies, estimating the potential links between neurological and genetic variability within a population is key. In this paper, we propose a multivariate, multimodal formulation for variable selection that leverages co-expression patterns across various data modalities. Our approach is based on an intuitive combination of two widely used statistical models: sparse regression and canonical correlation analysis (CCA). While the former seeks multivariate linear relationships between a given phenotype and associated observations, the latter searches to extract co-expression patterns between sets of variables belonging to different modalities. In the following, we propose to rely on a "CCA-type" formulation in order to regularize the classical multimodal sparse regression problem (essentially incorporating both CCA and regression models within a unified formulation). The underlying motivation is to extract discriminative variables that are also co-expressed across modalities. We first show that the simplest formulation of such model can be expressed as a special case of collaborative learning methods. After discussing its limitation, we propose an extended, more flexible formulation, and introduce a simple and efficient alternating minimization algorithm to solve the associated optimization problem. We explore the parameter space and provide some guidelines regarding parameter selection. Both the original and extended versions are then compared on a simple toy data set and a more advanced simulated imaging genomics data set in order to illustrate the benefits of the latter. Finally, we validate the proposed formulation using single nucleotide polymorphisms data and functional magnetic resonance imaging data from a population of adolescents ( subjects, age 16.9 ± 1.9 years from the Philadelphia Neurodevelopmental Cohort) for the study of learning ability. Furthermore, we carry out a significance analysis of the resulting features that allow us to carefully extract brain regions and genes linked to learning and cognitive ability.

Indexed as

Signal Processing, Computer-AssistedAdolescentAdultAlgorithmsBrainChildDatabases, GeneticGenomicsHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingNeuroimagingPolymorphism, Single NucleotideRegression AnalysisSystems BiologyYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID28678703
PMCPMC6415768

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.