Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28678549›Full record

ArticleHealth communication2018

Sentiment Analysis of an Online Breast Cancer Support Group: Communicating about Tamoxifen.

Mark L Cabling, Jeanine W Turner, Alejandra Hurtado-de-Mendoza, Yihong Zhang, Xinyang Jiang, Fabrizio Drago, Vanessa B Sheppard

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Health communication, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Mark L Cablinga Lombardi Comprehensive Cancer Center , Georgetown University Medical Center.
Jeanine W Turnerb Communication, Culture, and Technology Program , Georgetown University.
Alejandra Hurtado-de-Mendozaa Lombardi Comprehensive Cancer Center , Georgetown University Medical Center.
Yihong Zhanga Lombardi Comprehensive Cancer Center , Georgetown University Medical Center.
Xinyang Jianga Lombardi Comprehensive Cancer Center , Georgetown University Medical Center.
Fabrizio Dragoa Lombardi Comprehensive Cancer Center , Georgetown University Medical Center.
Vanessa B Sheppardc Health Behavior and Policy, Virginia Commonwealth University.

Funding

Institutional Career Development CoreKL2TR001432 · NCATS · GEORGETOWN UNIVERSITY · PI UMANS, JASON G · 2015 to 2024
$7.5M
PREDICTORS OF ADJUVANT ENDOCRINE THERAPY ADHERENCE IN WOMEN WITH BREAST CANCERR01CA154848 · NCI · GEORGETOWN UNIVERSITY · PI SHEPPARD, VANESSA B · 2011 to 2015
$2.5M
NCATS NIH HHS KL2 TR001432NCI NIH HHS R01 CA154848
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A better understanding of the breast cancer online narrative is important for a clearer conceptualizing of the role of online platforms in mediating health-related support. Sentiment analysis was conducted on a breast cancer online support group regarding Tamoxifen to understand users' emotions and opinions. This analysis was then contextualized within online social support literature. Out of the 498 users, the most active users were 80% more positive than least active users, while least active users were 48% more negative than most active ones; both differences were statistically significant. The higher the stage of cancer a user had, the less likelihood that she would have posted, and if she were to post, the post would have focused on her side effects and the anxiety/sadness that tailgates those side effects. The lower the stage of cancer a user had, the more likelihood that she would have posted, additionally remained active on the forum, and encouraged more (online) social support. This finding suggests that the online support platform may provide a context that exacerbates support for like-minded users where stronger ties are created around a specific sentiment within the community with less connection from those with dissimilar sentiments to the dominant group.

Indexed as

InternetSelf-Help GroupsAntineoplastic Agents, HormonalBreast NeoplasmsEmotionsFemaleHumansInformation Seeking BehaviorNeoplasm StagingSocial MediaTamoxifenAntineoplastic Agents, HormonalTamoxifen

Identifiers

PMID28678549
PMCPMC6077266

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.