Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28678423›Full record

ArticleChemphyschem : a European journal of chemical physics and physical chemistry2017

How Osmolytes Counteract Pressure Denaturation on a Molecular Scale.

Seishi Shimizu, Paul E Smith

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Chemphyschem : a European journal of chemical physics and physical chemistry, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 23% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Trimethylamine-N-oxide depletes urea in a peptide solvation shell.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2024
    Article
  3. In Silico and In Vitro Studies of Antibacterial Activity of Cow Urine Distillate (CUD).Evidence-based complementary and alternative medicine : eCAM · 2024
    Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Seishi ShimizuYork Structural Biology Laboratory, Department of Chemistry, University of York, Heslington, York, YO10 5DD, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7853-1683
Paul E SmithDepartment of Chemistry, Kansas State University, 213 CBC Building, Manhattan, Kansas, 66506-0401, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5565-3274
Kansas State University · USUniversity of York · GB

Funding

Residue Based Contributions to Protein Stability and AssociationR01GM118719 · NIGMS · KANSAS STATE UNIVERSITY · PI SMITH, PAUL E · 2016 to 2019
$1.1M
NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM118719
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Life in the deep sea exposes enzymes to high hydrostatic pressure, which decreases their stability. For survival, deep sea organisms tend to accumulate various osmolytes, most notably trimethylamine N-oxide used by fish, to counteract pressure denaturation. However, exactly how these osmolytes work remains unclear. Here, a rigorous statistical thermodynamics approach is used to clarify the mechanism of osmoprotection. It is shown that the weak, nonspecific, and dynamic interactions of water and osmolytes with proteins can be characterized only statistically, and that the competition between protein-osmolyte and protein-water interactions is crucial in determining conformational stability. Osmoprotection is driven by a stronger exclusion of osmolytes from the denatured protein than from the native conformation, and water distribution has no significant effect on these changes at low osmolyte concentrations.

Indexed as

OsmometryPressureProteinsThermodynamicsWaterProteinsWaterdenaturationfluctuation solution theoryosmolytesprotein stabilitystatistical thermodynamics

Identifiers

PMID28678423
PMCPMC5626881
OpenAlexW2731822887

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.