Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28678399›Full record

ArticleCurrent protocols in neuroscience2017

A Guide to Creating and Testing New INTRSECT Constructs.

Lief E Fenno, Joanna Mattis, Charu Ramakrishnan, Karl Deisseroth

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Current protocols in neuroscience, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 25% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 30 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Durability of transgene expression after rAAV gene therapy.Molecular therapy : the journal of the American Society of Gene Therapy · 2022
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Lief E FennoDepartment of Bioengineering, Stanford University, Stanford, California.
Joanna MattisDepartment of Neurology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
Charu RamakrishnanDepartment of Bioengineering, Stanford University, Stanford, California.
Karl DeisserothDepartment of Bioengineering, Stanford University, Stanford, California.
Stanford University · USUniversity of Pennsylvania · US

Funding

Howard Hughes Medical Institute
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

As the power of genetically encoded interventional and observational tools for neuroscience expands, the boundaries of experimental design are increasingly defined by limits in selectively expressing these tools in relevant cell types. Single-recombinase-dependent expression systems have been widely used as a means to restrict gene expression based on single features by combining recombinase-dependent viruses with recombinase-expressing transgenic animals. This protocol details how to create INTRSECT constructs and use multiple recombinases to achieve targeting of a desired gene to subsets of neurons that are defined by multiple genetic and/or topological features. This method includes the design and utilization of both viruses and transgenic animals: these tools are inherently flexible and modular and may be used in different combinations to achieve the desired gene expression pattern. © 2017 by John Wiley & Sons, Inc.

Indexed as

OptogeneticsAnimalsAnimals, Genetically ModifiedCloning, MolecularComputer SimulationGene ExpressionGenetic VectorsRecombinasesRecombination, GeneticRecombinasesINTRSECTneuroscienceoptogeneticssynthetic biologyvirus

Identifiers

PMID28678399
PMCPMC6892587
OpenAlexW2733894972

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.