Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28678078›Full record

ArticleEar and hearing

Responsiveness of the Electrically Stimulated Cochlear Nerve in Children With Cochlear Nerve Deficiency.

Shuman He, Bahar S Shahsavarani, Tyler C McFayden, Haibo Wang, Katherine E Gill, Lei Xu, Xiuhua Chao, Jianfen Luo, Ruijie Wang, Nancy He

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Ear and hearing. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 43 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
43citing papers in PubMed
2.6field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

43 citing papers in PubMed, 81 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. How differ eCAP types in cochlear implants users with and without inner ear malformations: amplitude growth function, spread of excitation, refractory recovery function.European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery · 2025
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Electrophysiological Characteristics in Pediatric Cochlear Implantation.Indian journal of otolaryngology and head and neck surgery : official publication of the Association of Otolaryngologists of India · 2024
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Cochlear Health and Cochlear-implant Function.Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology : JARO · 2023
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Shuman HeCenter for Hearing Research, Boys Town National Research Hospital, Omaha, Nebraska.
Bahar S ShahsavaraniCenter for Hearing Research, Boys Town National Research Hospital, Omaha, Nebraska.
Tyler C McFaydenCenter for Hearing Research, Boys Town National Research Hospital, Omaha, Nebraska.
Haibo WangCenter for Hearing Research, Boys Town National Research Hospital, Omaha, Nebraska.
Katherine E GillCenter for Hearing Research, Boys Town National Research Hospital, Omaha, Nebraska.
Lei XuCenter for Hearing Research, Boys Town National Research Hospital, Omaha, Nebraska.
Xiuhua ChaoCenter for Hearing Research, Boys Town National Research Hospital, Omaha, Nebraska.
Jianfen LuoCenter for Hearing Research, Boys Town National Research Hospital, Omaha, Nebraska.
Ruijie WangCenter for Hearing Research, Boys Town National Research Hospital, Omaha, Nebraska.
Nancy HeCenter for Hearing Research, Boys Town National Research Hospital, Omaha, Nebraska.
Purdue University West Lafayette · US

Funding

The Impact of Mild Hearing Loss on Auditory Perception in Complex EnvironmentsP20GM109023 · NIGMS · FATHER FLANAGAN'S BOYS' HOME · PI LEIBOLD, LORI J. · 2014 to 2023
$23.4M
Short-Term Research Training for AuD StudentsT35DC008757 · NIDCD · FATHER FLANAGAN'S BOYS' HOME · PI Kristen L. Janky · 2007 to 2026
$683k
Electrically-evoked neural responses in children with auditory neuropathyR03DC013153 · NIDCD · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI HE, SHUMAN · 2013 to 2015
$454k
NIDCD NIH HHS R03 DC013153NIDCD NIH HHS T35 DC008757NIGMS NIH HHS P20 GM109023
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesThis study aimed to (1) investigate the responsiveness of the cochlear nerve (CN) to a single biphasic-electrical pulse in implanted children with cochlear nerve deficiency (CND) and (2) compare their results with those measured in implanted children with normal-size CNs.

designParticipants included 23 children with CND (CND1 to CND23) and 18 children with normal-size CNs (S1 to S18). All subjects except for CND1 used Cochlear Nucleus cochlear implants with contour electrode arrays in their test ears. CND1 was implanted with a Cochlear Nucleus Freedom cochlear implant with a straight electrode array in the test ear. For each subject, the CN input/output (I/O) function and the refractory recovery function were measured using electrophysiological measures of the electrically evoked compound action potential (eCAP) at multiple electrode sites across the electrode array. Dependent variables included eCAP threshold, the maximum eCAP amplitude, slope of the I/O function, and time-constants of the refractory recovery function. Slopes of I/O functions were estimated using statistical modeling with a sigmoidal function. Recovery time-constants, including measures of the absolute refractory period and the relative refractory period, were estimated using statistical modeling with an exponential decay function. Generalized linear mixed-effect models were used to evaluate the effects of electrode site on the dependent variables measured in children with CND and to compare results of these dependent variables between subject groups.

resultsThe eCAP was recorded at all test electrodes in children with normal-size CNs. In contrast, the eCAP could not be recorded at any electrode site in 4 children with CND. For all other children with CND, the percentage of electrodes with measurable eCAPs decreased as the stimulating site moved in a basal-to-apical direction. For children with CND, the stimulating site had a significant effect on the slope of the I/O functions and the relative refractory period but showed no significant effect on eCAP threshold and the maximum eCAP amplitude. Children with CND had significantly higher eCAP thresholds, smaller maximum eCAP amplitudes, flatter slopes of I/O functions, and longer absolute refractory periods than children with normal-size CNs. There was no significant difference in the relative refractory period measured in these two subject groups.

conclusionsIn children with CND, the functional status of the CN varied along the length of the cochlea. Compared with children with normal-size CNs, children with CND showed reduced CN responsiveness to electrical stimuli. The prolonged CN absolute refractory period in children with CND might account for, at least partially, the observed benefit of using relatively slow pulse rate in these patients.

Indexed as

Cochlear ImplantsElectric StimulationAdolescentCase-Control StudiesChildChild, PreschoolCochleaCochlear NerveDeafnessFemaleHumansMale

Identifiers

PMID28678078
PMCPMC5748379
OpenAlexW2726847069

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.