ArticleMicrobiologyOpen2017
Identification of suitable reference genes during the formation of chlamydospores in Clonostachys rosea 67-1.
Article in MicrobiologyOpen, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.
- Clonostachys rosea 'omics profiling: identification of putative metabolite-gene associations mediating its in vitro antagonism against Fusarium graminearum.BMC genomics · 2023Article
- Whole RNA-sequencing and gene expression analysis of Trichoderma harzianum Tr-92 under chlamydospore-producing condition.Genes & genomics · 2019Article
- Identification of genes related to chlamydospore formation in Clonostachys rosea 67-1.MicrobiologyOpen · 2019Article
- TaqMan qPCR for Quantification ofFrontiers in microbiology · 2019Article
- Identification of suitable reference genes during the formation of chlamydospores in Clonostachys rosea 67-1.MicrobiologyOpen · 2017Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Clonostachys rosea is a potential biocontrol fungus that can produce highly resistant chlamydospores under specific conditions. To investigate the genes related to chlamydospore formation, we identified reliable reference genes for quantification of gene expression in C. rosea 67-1 during sporulation. In this study, nine reference genes, actin (ACT), elongation factor 1 (EF1), glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase (GAPDH), histone (HIS), RNA polymerase II CTD phosphatase Fcp1 (RPP), succinate-semialdehyde dehydrogenase (SSD), TATA-binding protein (TBP), ubiquitin (UBQ), and ubiquitin-conjugating enzyme (UCE), were selected and cloned from 67-1, and their expression stability during chlamydospore formation was determined using reverse transcription quantitative PCR and assessed using the software geNorm, NormFinder and BestKeeper. The Ct values of the candidates ranged from 19.9 to 29.7, among which HIS, ACT and SSD exhibited high expression levels. The statistical analysis showed that ACT and SSD were most stably expressed, while UBQ and GAPDH showed relatively large variations under different culture conditions. Calculation of pairwise variation value indicated that two reference genes were required for precise quantification. Finally, ACT and SSD were selected to normalize gene expression during chlamydospore production in C. rosea 67-1. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first report of SSD as a reference gene. This study will facilitate the accurate quantification of differentially expressed genes during the generation of chlamydospores and contribute to the investigation of the molecular mechanism underlying chlamydospore formation in C. rosea.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.