Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28677076›Full record

ArticleQuality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation2018

Cross-cultural adaptation and validation of the Danish version of the Short Musculoskeletal Function Assessment questionnaire (SMFA).

Marianne Lindahl, Signe Andersen, Annette Joergensen, Christian Frandsen, Liselotte Jensen, Eirikur Benedikz

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Quality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 25% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Improvement in Functional Outcomes After Elective Symptomatic Orthopaedic Implant Removal.Journal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons. Global research & reviews · 2020
    Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Marianne LindahlFaculty of Health, Physiotherapy Education, University College Zealand, Campus Naestved, Parkvej 190, 4700, Naestved, Denmark. mli@ucsj.dk.ORCID 0000-0002-9183-083X
Signe AndersenFaculty of Health, Physiotherapy Education, University College Zealand, Campus Naestved, Parkvej 190, 4700, Naestved, Denmark.
Annette JoergensenFaculty of Health, Physiotherapy Education, University College Zealand, Campus Naestved, Parkvej 190, 4700, Naestved, Denmark.
Christian FrandsenFaculty of Health, Physiotherapy Education, University College Zealand, Campus Naestved, Parkvej 190, 4700, Naestved, Denmark.
Liselotte JensenFaculty of Health, Physiotherapy Education, University College Zealand, Campus Naestved, Parkvej 190, 4700, Naestved, Denmark.
Eirikur BenedikzFaculty of Health, Physiotherapy Education, University College Zealand, Campus Naestved, Parkvej 190, 4700, Naestved, Denmark.
University College Absalon · DK

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThe aim of this study was to translate and culturally adapt the Short Musculoskeletal Function Assessment (SMFA) into Danish (SMFA-DK) and assess the psychometric properties.

methodsSMFA was translated and cross-culturally adapted according to a standardized procedure. Minor changes in the wording in three items were made to adapt to Danish conditions. Acute patients (n = 201) and rehabilitation patients (n = 231) with musculoskeletal problems aged 18-87 years were included. The following analysis were made to evaluate psychometric quality of SMFA-DK: Reliability with Chronbach's alpha, content validity as coding according to the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF), floor/ceiling effects, construct validity as factor analysis, correlations between SMFA-DK and Short Form 36 and also known group method. Responsiveness and effect size were calculated.

resultsCronbach's alpha values were between 0.79 and 0.94. SMFA-DK captured all components of the ICF, and there were no floor/ceiling effects. Factor analysis demonstrated four subscales. SMFA-DK correlated good with the SF-36 subscales for the rehabilitation patients and lower for the newly injured patients. Effect sizes were excellent and better for SMFA-DK than for SF-36.

conclusionThe study indicates that SMFA-DK can be a valid and responsive measure of outcome in rehabilitation settings.

Indexed as

Cross-Cultural ComparisonDisability EvaluationAgedFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedMusculoskeletal DiseasesPsychometricsQuality of LifeReproducibility of ResultsSurveys and QuestionnairesSwedenCross-cultural adaptationDanishICFRehabilitationShort Musculoskeletal Function AssessmentValitity

Identifiers

PMID28677076
OpenAlexW2724741640

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.