Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28677067›Full record

Observational studyEuropean radiology2017

Intra-arterial therapy of neuroendocrine tumour liver metastases: comparing conventional TACE, drug-eluting beads TACE and yttrium-90 radioembolisation as treatment options using a propensity score analysis model.

Duc Do Minh, Julius Chapiro, Boris Gorodetski, Qiang Huang, Cuihong Liu, Susanne Smolka, Lynn Jeanette Savic, David Wainstejn, MingDe Lin, Todd Schlachter and 2 more

Open access · greenAbstract readComparative StudyObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in European radiology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 35 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
35citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
4.0field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

35 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 71 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. New frontiers in radioembolization.Therapeutic advances in medical oncology · 2024
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. CIRSE Standards of Practice on Hepatic Transarterial Chemoembolisation.Cardiovascular and interventional radiology · 2021
    Article
  20. Radioembolization of Secondary Hepatic Malignancies.Seminars in interventional radiology · 2021
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.

Duc Do MinhDepartment of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Charité Universitätsmedizin, Campus Virchow Klinikum, Berlin, Germany.
Julius ChapiroDepartment of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA.
Boris GorodetskiDepartment of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Charité Universitätsmedizin, Campus Virchow Klinikum, Berlin, Germany.
Qiang HuangDepartment of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA.
Cuihong LiuDepartment of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA.
Susanne SmolkaDepartment of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Charité Universitätsmedizin, Campus Virchow Klinikum, Berlin, Germany.
Lynn Jeanette SavicDepartment of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Charité Universitätsmedizin, Campus Virchow Klinikum, Berlin, Germany.
David WainstejnDepartment of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Charité Universitätsmedizin, Campus Virchow Klinikum, Berlin, Germany.
MingDe LinDepartment of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA.
Todd SchlachterDepartment of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA.
Bernhard GebauerDepartment of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Charité Universitätsmedizin, Campus Virchow Klinikum, Berlin, Germany.
Jean-François GeschwindDepartment of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA. jeff.geschwind@yale.edu.
Yale University · USCharité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin · DECapital Medical University · CN

Funding

Yale Clinical and Translational Science Award (U Component)UL1TR001863 · NCATS · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI John H. Krystal, LUCILA OHNO-MACHADO · 2016 to 2026
$102.9M
Quantitative Multimodal Imaging Biomarkers for Combined Locoregional and Immunotherapy of Liver CancerR01CA206180 · NCI · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI CHAPIRO, JULIUS, DUNCAN, JAMES S · 2016 to 2025
$6.1M
See, Reach, Treat Tumor-Optimized Transarterial Chemoembolization DrugDeliveryR01CA160771 · NCI · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI GESCHWIND, JEAN-FRANCOIS H, LIN, MINGDE · 2011 to 2015
$2.6M
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR001863NCI NIH HHS R01 CA160771NCI NIH HHS R01 CA206180
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesTo compare efficacy, survival outcome and prognostic factors of conventional transarterial chemoembolisation (cTACE), drug-eluting beads TACE (DEB-TACE) and yttrium-90 radioembolisation (Y90) for the treatment of liver metastases from gastroenteropancreatic (GEP) neuroendocrine tumours (NELM).

methodsThis retrospective analysis included 192 patients (58.6 years mean age, 56% men) with NELM treated with cTACE (N = 122), DEB-TACE (N = 26) or Y90 (N = 44) between 2000 and 2014. Radiologic response to therapy was assessed according to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumours (RECIST) and World Health Organization (WHO) criteria using periprocedural MR imaging. Survival analysis included propensity score analysis (PSA), median overall survival (MOS), hepatic progression-free survival, Kaplan-Meier using log-rank test and the uni- and multivariate Cox proportional hazards model (MVA).

resultsMOS of the entire study population was 28.8 months. As for cTACE, DEB-TACE and Y90, MOS was 33.8 months, 21.7 months and 23.6 months, respectively. According to the MVA, cTACE demonstrated a significantly longer MOS as compared to DEB-TACE (p <.01) or Y90 (p = .02). The 5-year survival rate after initial cTACE, DEB-TACE and Y90 was 28.2%, 10.3% and 18.5%, respectively.

conclusionsUpon PSA, our study suggests significant survival benefits for patients treated with cTACE as compared to DEB-TACE and Y90. This data supports the therapeutic decision for cTACE as the primary intra-arterial therapy option in patients with unresectable NELM until proven otherwise. KEY POINTS: • cTACE achieved a significantly longer overall survival in patients with unresectable NELM. • Patients treated with cTACE showed a prolonged hepatic progression-free survival. • cTACE, DEB-TACE and Y90 radioembolisation demonstrated comparable safety and toxicity profiles. • Age >70 years, extrahepatic metastases and tumour burden >50% were identified as negative predictors. • Propensity score analysis suggests the superiority of cTACE over DEB-TACE and Y90.

Indexed as

Gastrointestinal NeoplasmsNeuroendocrine TumorsADAM17 ProteinAdultAgedBiomarkers, TumorChemoembolization, TherapeuticEpidemiologic MethodsFemaleHumansLiver NeoplasmsMaleMiddle AgedRadiopharmaceuticalsTreatment OutcomeYttrium RadioisotopesADAM17 ProteinADAM17 protein, humanBiomarkers, TumorRadiopharmaceuticalsYttrium-90Yttrium RadioisotopesChemoembolisationDrug-eluting beads, DEBNeuroendocrine tumoursPropensity scoreYttrium-90 radioembolisation, Y90

Identifiers

PMID28677067
PMCPMC5675796
OpenAlexW2725873592

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.