Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28676989›Full record

ArticleInternational ophthalmology2018

In vivo and ex vivo evaluation of cell-cell interactions, adhesion and migration in ocular surface of patients undergone excimer laser refractive surgery after topical therapy with different lubricant eyedrops.

Roberta Calienno, Claudia Curcio, Manuela Lanzini, Mario Nubile, Leonardo Mastropasqua

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in International ophthalmology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
0.2field-weighted citation impact, top 34% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Regulating Tissue Growth Factors for Healing With Etherified Carboxymethylcellulose Matrix.Journal of burn care & research : official publication of the American Burn Association · 2024
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Roberta CaliennoDepartment of Medicine and Ageing Sciences, Ophthalmology Clinic, University"G. d'Annunzio" of Chieti-Pescara, Chieti, Italy.
Claudia CurcioDepartment of Medicine and Ageing Sciences, Visual Science Laboratory, CeSI, University"G. d'Annunzio" of Chieti-Pescara, Via dei Vestini, 66100, Chieti, Italy. c.curcio@unich.it.
Manuela LanziniDepartment of Medicine and Ageing Sciences, Ophthalmology Clinic, University"G. d'Annunzio" of Chieti-Pescara, Chieti, Italy.
Mario NubileDepartment of Medicine and Ageing Sciences, Ophthalmology Clinic, University"G. d'Annunzio" of Chieti-Pescara, Chieti, Italy.
Leonardo MastropasquaDepartment of Medicine and Ageing Sciences, Ophthalmology Clinic, University"G. d'Annunzio" of Chieti-Pescara, Chieti, Italy.
University of Chieti-Pescara · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo investigate, in vivo by means of in vivo confocal microscopy (IVCM) and ex vivo by impression cytology, epithelial cellular damage after excimer laser refractive surgery in patients under different topical lubricant therapies.

methodsTwo hundred eyes of 100 patients, undergone bilateral excimer laser refractive surgery for medium myopic error correction [spherical equivalent refraction from -1.75 to -3.50 dioptres (D) with refractive astigmatism under -0.75 D], have been recruited. All patients received, in addition to standard therapy for refractive surgery, high weight hyaluronic acid 0.2% eyedrops in one randomly selected eye and carboxymethylcellulose 1% eyedrop in the comparator eye (control eye) 4 times daily for 90 days. Follow-up included a baseline visit and further examination 7-, 30- and 90-day intervals [clinical evaluation with Schirmer test and tear break-up time (TBUT), IVCM and impression cytology].

resultsNo significant difference in Schirmer test and TBUT was observed during the follow-up period in eyes under different therapies. IVCM showed an improvement of conjunctival and corneal epithelial cells quality in eye in treatment with high weight hyaluronic acid 0.2% when compared to carboxymethylcellulose. Conjunctival impression cytology demonstrated an evident positivity for CD44 in eyes treated with both treatments in all follow-up controls. ICAM1 expression showed an increasing positivity starting at 30 days that became statistically significant after 90 days of high weight hyaluronic acid 0.2% therapy (p = 0.0167).

conclusionsIn vivo and in vitro results showed the effectiveness of high weight hyaluronic acid 0.2% in facilitating cell-cell interaction, migration, cell proliferation, stabilizing epithelial barrier of the ocular surface. Moreover, use of high weight hyaluronic acid in treatment of corneal tissue damage after refractive surgery, in concordance with standard topical corticosteroids and antibiotics therapy, could be effective in promoting corneal epithelial wound healing with consequent good results in clinical outcome and patients' satisfaction.

Indexed as

Refractive Surgical ProceduresAdultCarboxymethylcellulose SodiumCell AdhesionCell CommunicationCell MovementConjunctivaCorneaEpithelial CellsEpithelium, CornealFemaleHumansHyaluronic AcidLasers, ExcimerLubricant Eye DropsMaleCarboxymethylcellulose SodiumHyaluronic AcidLubricant Eye DropsHyaluronic acidImpression cytologyIn vivo confocal microscopyRefractive surgery

Identifiers

PMID28676989
OpenAlexW2733221504

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.