Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28676697›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2017

A novel 3D-printed head phantom with anatomically realistic geometry and continuously varying skull resistivity distribution for electrical impedance tomography.

Jie Zhang, Bin Yang, Haoting Li, Feng Fu, Xuetao Shi, Xiuzhen Dong, Meng Dai

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
2.5field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 45 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. [Finite-element simulation and experimental investigation of nanosecond transcranial pulsed electric field propagation and distribution in a three-dimensional brain model].Sheng wu yi xue gong cheng xue za zhi = Journal of biomedical engineering = Shengwu yixue gongchengxue zazhi · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. [Research on the brain phantom for transcranial electromagnetic neuromodulation].Sheng wu yi xue gong cheng xue za zhi = Journal of biomedical engineering = Shengwu yixue gongchengxue zazhi · 2024
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. A review of bio-impedance devices.Medical & biological engineering & computing · 2023
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Jie ZhangFaculty of Biomedical Engineering, Fourth Military Medical University, 169 West Changle Road, Xi'an, 710032, China.
Bin YangFaculty of Biomedical Engineering, Fourth Military Medical University, 169 West Changle Road, Xi'an, 710032, China.
Haoting LiFaculty of Biomedical Engineering, Fourth Military Medical University, 169 West Changle Road, Xi'an, 710032, China.
Feng FuFaculty of Biomedical Engineering, Fourth Military Medical University, 169 West Changle Road, Xi'an, 710032, China.
Xuetao ShiFaculty of Biomedical Engineering, Fourth Military Medical University, 169 West Changle Road, Xi'an, 710032, China.
Xiuzhen DongFaculty of Biomedical Engineering, Fourth Military Medical University, 169 West Changle Road, Xi'an, 710032, China. dongxiuzhen@fmmu.edu.cn.
Meng DaiFaculty of Biomedical Engineering, Fourth Military Medical University, 169 West Changle Road, Xi'an, 710032, China. daimeng@fmmu.edu.cn.
Air Force Medical University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Phantom experiments are an important step for testing during the development of new hardware or imaging algorithms for head electrical impedance tomography (EIT) studies. However, due to the sophisticated anatomical geometry and complex resistivity distribution of the human head, constructing an accurate phantom for EIT research remains challenging, especially for skull modelling. In this paper, we designed and fabricated a novel head phantom with anatomically realistic geometry and continuously varying skull resistivity distribution based on 3D printing techniques. The skull model was constructed by simultaneously printing the distinct layers inside the skull with resistivity-controllable printing materials. The entire phantom was composed of saline skin, a 3D-printed skull, saline cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) and 3D-printed brain parenchyma. The validation results demonstrated that the resistivity of the phantom was in good agreement with that of human tissue and was stable over time, and the new phantom performed well in EIT imaging. This paper provides a standardized, efficient and reproducible method for the construction of a head phantom for EIT that could be easily adapted to other conditions for manufacturing head phantoms for brain function research, such as transcranial direct current stimulation (TDCS) and electroencephalography (EEG).

Indexed as

Printing, Three-DimensionalComputer SimulationElectric ImpedanceHeadHumansModels, AnatomicPhantoms, ImagingSkullTomography

Identifiers

PMID28676697
PMCPMC5496891
OpenAlexW2731864094

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.