Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28676647›Full record

SynthesisScientific reports2017

Genetic associations for keratoconus: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Shi Song Rong, Sarah Tsz Ue Ma, Xin Ting Yu, Li Ma, Wai Kit Chu, Tommy Chung Yan Chan, Yu Meng Wang, Alvin L Young, Chi Pui Pang, Vishal Jhanji and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Scientific reports, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 38 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
38citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
6.2field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

38 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 82 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Keratoconus.Nature reviews. Disease primers · 2024
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Systemic and Ocular Associations of Keratoconus.Expert review of ophthalmology · 2024
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.

Shi Song RongDepartment of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China.ORCID 0000-0001-8352-6363
Sarah Tsz Ue MaDepartment of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China.
Xin Ting YuDepartment of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China.
Li MaDepartment of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China.
Wai Kit ChuDepartment of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China.
Tommy Chung Yan ChanDepartment of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China.
Yu Meng WangDepartment of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China.
Alvin L YoungDepartment of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China.
Chi Pui PangDepartment of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China.
Vishal JhanjiDepartment of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China. vishaljhanji@cuhk.edu.hk.
Li Jia ChenDepartment of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China. lijia_chen@cuhk.edu.hk.
Chinese University of Hong Kong · HKBeth Israel Deaconess Medical Center · USMassachusetts Eye and Ear Infirmary · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Genetic associations for keratoconus could be useful for understanding disease pathogenesis and discovering biomarkers for early detection of the disease. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to summarize all reported genetic associations for the disease. We searched in the MEDLINE, Embase, Web of Science, and HuGENET databases for genetic studies of keratoconus published from 1950 to June 2016. The summary odds ratio and 95% confidence intervals of all polymorphisms were estimated using the random-effect model. Among 639 reports that were retrieved, 24 fulfilled required criteria as eligible studies for meta-analysis, involving a total of 53 polymorphisms in 28 genes/loci. Results of our meta-analysis lead to the prioritization of 8 single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) in 6 genes/loci for keratoconus in Whites. Of them 5 genes/loci were originally detected in genome-wide association studies, including FOXO1 (rs2721051, P = 5.6 × 10

Indexed as

Genetic MarkersPolymorphism, Single NucleotideAdolescentAdultAgedCollagen Type IVCollagen Type VEarly DiagnosisEndopeptidasesFibronectinsForkhead Box Protein O1Genetic Association StudiesGenetic Predisposition to DiseaseHumansKeratoconusMiddle AgedCOL4A4 protein, humanCOL5A1 protein, humanCollagen Type IVCollagen Type VEndopeptidasesFibronectinsFNDC3B protein, humanForkhead Box Protein O1FOXO1 protein, humanGenetic MarkersIMMP2L protein, human

Identifiers

PMID28676647
PMCPMC5496893
OpenAlexW2731569967

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.