Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28676471›Full record

ArticleJournal of medical Internet research2017

Patterns of Twitter Behavior Among Networks of Cannabis Dispensaries in California.

Nicholas C Peiper, Peter M Baumgartner, Robert F Chew, Yuli P Hsieh, Gayle S Bieler, Georgiy V Bobashev, Christopher Siege, Gary A Zarkin

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of medical Internet research, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Infodemiology and Infoveillance: Scoping Review.Journal of medical Internet research · 2020
    Article
  4. Interpol review of controlled substances 2016-2019.Forensic science international. Synergy · 2020
    Review
  5. Cannabis regulatory science: risk-benefit considerations for mental disorders.International review of psychiatry (Abingdon, England) · 2018
    Review
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Nicholas C PeiperRTI International, Behavioral Health and Criminal Justice Research Division, Research Triangle Park, NC, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-9154-0584
Peter M BaumgartnerRTI International, Center for Data Science, Research Triangle Park, NC, United States.ORCID 0000-0003-3117-6239
Robert F ChewRTI International, Center for Data Science, Research Triangle Park, NC, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-6979-1766
Yuli P HsiehRTI International, Survey Research Division, Research Triangle Park, NC, United States.ORCID 0000-0003-3095-3518
Gayle S BielerRTI International, Center for Data Science, Research Triangle Park, NC, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-5933-2865
Georgiy V BobashevRTI International, Center for Data Science, Research Triangle Park, NC, United States.ORCID 0000-0003-2346-1400
Christopher SiegeRTI International, Research Computing Division, Research Triangle Park, NC, United States.ORCID 0000-0001-8771-2331
Gary A ZarkinRTI International, Behavioral Health and Criminal Justice Research Division, Research Triangle Park, NC, United States.ORCID 0000-0003-3331-0788

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundTwitter represents a social media platform through which medical cannabis dispensaries can rapidly promote and advertise a multitude of retail products. Yet, to date, no studies have systematically evaluated Twitter behavior among dispensaries and how these behaviors influence the formation of social networks.

objectivesThis study sought to characterize common cyberbehaviors and shared follower networks among dispensaries operating in two large cannabis markets in California.

methodsFrom a targeted sample of 119 dispensaries in the San Francisco Bay Area and Greater Los Angeles, we collected metadata from the dispensary accounts using the Twitter API. For each city, we characterized the network structure of dispensaries based upon shared followers, then empirically derived communities with the Louvain modularity algorithm. Principal components factor analysis was employed to reduce 12 Twitter measures into a more parsimonious set of cyberbehavioral dimensions. Finally, quadratic discriminant analysis was implemented to verify the ability of the extracted dimensions to classify dispensaries into their derived communities.

resultsThe modularity algorithm yielded three communities in each city with distinct network structures. The principal components factor analysis reduced the 12 cyberbehaviors into five dimensions that encompassed account age, posting frequency, referencing, hyperlinks, and user engagement among the dispensary accounts. In the quadratic discriminant analysis, the dimensions correctly classified 75% (46/61) of the communities in the San Francisco Bay Area and 71% (41/58) in Greater Los Angeles.

conclusionsThe most centralized and strongly connected dispensaries in both cities had newer accounts, higher daily activity, more frequent user engagement, and increased usage of embedded media, keywords, and hyperlinks. Measures derived from both network structure and cyberbehavioral dimensions can serve as key contextual indicators for the online surveillance of cannabis dispensaries and consumer markets over time.

Indexed as

Social NetworkingCaliforniaCannabisHumansInternetSocial MediacannabisInternetmarijuanasocial mediasocial networking

Identifiers

PMID28676471
PMCPMC5516098

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.