ReviewBMC veterinary research2017
Antimicrobial drug use in food-producing animals and associated human health risks: what, and how strong, is the evidence?
Review in BMC veterinary research, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 131 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
131 citing papers in PubMed.
- Antimicrobial prescribing guidelines for feedlot cattle.Australian veterinary journal · 2026Article
- Multilevel analysis of risk factors for clinical mastitis in dairy cows in Plateau State, Nigeria: a hierarchical mixed-effects logistic regression modelling approach.BMC veterinary research · 2026Article
- Impact of lactic acid bacteria andVeterinary and animal science · 2026Article
- When good knowledge falls short: identity and geography drive inappropriate antibiotic use in Malaysia.BMC public health · 2026Article
- Comprehensive genomic characterization and public health implications of multidrug-resistant Escherichia coli from poultry in Noakhali, Bangladesh.BMC microbiology · 2026Article
- Multidrug-resistant non-typhoidal Salmonella and Escherichia coli in imported poultry products in the Maldives.Access microbiology · 2026Article
- Long-term effects of systemic ceftiofur and ampicillin on the abundance and duration of shedding of resistant Gram-negative bacteria in the feces of healthy dairy cows: a randomized clinical trial.Frontiers in veterinary science · 2026Article
- Prospects for antibiotic-free poultry production in South Africa: An analysis of the enablers and stumbling blocks.One health (Amsterdam, Netherlands) · 2025Review
- A Comprehensive Review of the Application of Bacteriophages Against Enteric Bacterial Infection in Poultry: Current Status, Challenges, and Future Prospects.Antibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Antimicrobial use in sows in Finland and its association with herd characteristics.Porcine health management · 2025Article
- Fluoroquinolone Residues in Piglet Viscera and Their Impact on Intestinal Microbiota Resistance: A One Health Approach.Microorganisms · 2025Article
- Assessing the Impacts of Dairy Farm Antimicrobial Use on the Bovine Fecal Microbiome.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2025Article
- The opportunities for and barriers to antimicrobial resistance surveillance by lot quality assurance sampling in livestock: Findings from interviews with stakeholders in Germany.One health (Amsterdam, Netherlands) · 2025Article
- Exogenous prostaglandin DFrontiers in veterinary science · 2025Article
- Knowledge and practices related to antimicrobial use in fighting cocks - a survey of fighting cock owners in Timor-Leste.Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2025Article
- Antimicrobial resistance at a turning point: microbial drivers, one health, and global futures.Frontiers in microbiology · 2025Review
- Veterinarians' attitudes, knowledge, and practices about antibiotic use in animals: questionnaire design and reliability.Frontiers in veterinary science · 2025Article
- Unravelling Antimicrobial Resistance inVeterinary sciences · 2024Review
- Highly electroactive Co-ZnO/GO nanocomposite: Electrochemical sensing platform for oxytetracycline determination.Heliyon · 2024Article
- Extended-Spectrum Beta-Lactamase-ProducingAntibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Review
71 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundAntimicrobial resistance is a public health threat. Because antimicrobial consumption in food-producing animals contributes to the problem, policies restricting the inappropriate or unnecessary agricultural use of antimicrobial drugs are important. However, this link between agricultural antibiotic use and antibiotic resistance has remained contested by some, with potentially disruptive effects on efforts to move towards the judicious or prudent use of these drugs. MAIN TEXT: The goal of this review is to systematically evaluate the types of evidence available for each step in the causal pathway from antimicrobial use on farms to human public health risk, and to evaluate the strength of evidence within a 'Grades of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation'(GRADE) framework. The review clearly demonstrates that there is compelling scientific evidence available to support each step in the causal pathway, from antimicrobial use on farms to a public health burden caused by infections with resistant pathogens. Importantly, the pathogen, antimicrobial drug and treatment regimen, and general setting (e.g., feed type) can have significant impacts on how quickly resistance emerges or spreads, for how long resistance may persist after antimicrobial exposures cease, and what public health impacts may be associated with antimicrobial use on farms. Therefore an exact quantification of the public health burden attributable to antimicrobial drug use in animal agriculture compared to other sources remains challenging.
conclusionsEven though more research is needed to close existing data gaps, obtain a better understanding of how antimicrobial drugs are actually used on farms or feedlots, and quantify the risk associated with antimicrobial use in animal agriculture, these findings reinforce the need to act now and restrict antibiotic use in animal agriculture to those instances necessary to ensure the health and well-being of the animals.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.