ArticleGenetics, selection, evolution : GSE2017
The potential of shifting recombination hotspots to increase genetic gain in livestock breeding.
Article in Genetics, selection, evolution : GSE, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
17 citing papers in PubMed.
- Optimum recombination rates for genetic gains in simulated recurrent selection in empirical maize populations.The plant genome · 2026Article
- Simulating the impact of recombination rate on genomic selection breeding outcomes.G3 (Bethesda, Md.) · 2026Article
- Mixed Outcomes in Recombination Rates After Domestication: Revisiting Theory and Data.Molecular ecology · 2025Review
- Independent genetic basis of meiotic crossover positioning and interference in domestic pigs.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Understanding the Genetic Basis of Variation in Meiotic Recombination: Past, Present, and Future.Molecular biology and evolution · 2024Review
- Variability ofFrontiers in genetics · 2024Article
- Genetic architecture of individual meiotic crossover rate and distribution in Atlantic Salmon.Scientific reports · 2023Article
- If it ain't broke, don't fix it: evaluating the effect of increased recombination on response to selection for wheat breeding.G3 (Bethesda, Md.) · 2022Article
- Fourth Report on Chicken Genes and Chromosomes 2022.Cytogenetic and genome research · 2022Review
- Deep learning versus parametric and ensemble methods for genomic prediction of complex phenotypes.Genetics, selection, evolution : GSE · 2020Article
- Assessing by Modeling the Consequences of Increased Recombination in Recurrent Selection ofG3 (Bethesda, Md.) · 2019Article
- Molecular evolution of the meiotic recombination pathway in mammals.Evolution; international journal of organic evolution · 2019Article
- Assessment of breeding programs sustainability: application of phenotypic and genomic indicators to a North European grain maize program.TAG. Theoretical and applied genetics. Theoretische und angewandte Genetik · 2019Article
- Manipulation of crossover frequency and distribution for plant breeding.TAG. Theoretical and applied genetics. Theoretische und angewandte Genetik · 2019Review
- Interbreed variation in meiotic recombination rate and distribution in the domestic chickenArchives animal breeding · 2019Article
- A Genomic Region ContainingG3 (Bethesda, Md.) · 2018Article
- Characterization of recombination features and the genetic basis in multiple cattle breeds.BMC genomics · 2018Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundThis study uses simulation to explore and quantify the potential effect of shifting recombination hotspots on genetic gain in livestock breeding programs.
methodsWe simulated three scenarios that differed in the locations of quantitative trait nucleotides (QTN) and recombination hotspots in the genome. In scenario 1, QTN were randomly distributed along the chromosomes and recombination was restricted to occur within specific genomic regions (i.e. recombination hotspots). In the other two scenarios, both QTN and recombination hotspots were located in specific regions, but differed in whether the QTN occurred outside of (scenario 2) or inside (scenario 3) recombination hotspots. We split each chromosome into 250, 500 or 1000 regions per chromosome of which 10% were recombination hotspots and/or contained QTN. The breeding program was run for 21 generations of selection, after which recombination hotspot regions were kept the same or were shifted to adjacent regions for a further 80 generations of selection. We evaluated the effect of shifting recombination hotspots on genetic gain, genetic variance and genic variance.
resultsOur results show that shifting recombination hotspots reduced the decline of genetic and genic variance by releasing standing allelic variation in the form of new allele combinations. This in turn resulted in larger increases in genetic gain. However, the benefit of shifting recombination hotspots for increased genetic gain was only observed when QTN were initially outside recombination hotspots. If QTN were initially inside recombination hotspots then shifting them decreased genetic gain. DISCUSSION: Shifting recombination hotspots to regions of the genome where recombination had not occurred for 21 generations of selection (i.e. recombination deserts) released more of the standing allelic variation available in each generation and thus increased genetic gain. However, whether and how much increase in genetic gain was achieved by shifting recombination hotspots depended on the distribution of QTN in the genome, the number of recombination hotspots and whether QTN were initially inside or outside recombination hotspots.
conclusionsOur findings show future scope for targeted modification of recombination hotspots e.g. through changes in zinc-finger motifs of the PRDM9 protein to increase genetic gain in production species.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.