ReviewDiabetes, obesity & metabolism2018
The challenges of achieving postprandial glucose control using closed-loop systems in patients with type 1 diabetes.
Review in Diabetes, obesity & metabolism, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06546657 (An Investigation Into Diurnal Variability in Glucose Levels in Paediatric Patients With Type 1 Diabetes), which is not on this map. Cited by 51 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
An Investigation Into Diurnal Variability in Glucose Levels in Paediatric Patients With Type 1 Diabetes (T1D) and Their Responses to Different Food Compositions
Who cites it
51 citing papers in PubMed, 104 citations in OpenAlex.
- Trial
- Impact of Simplification Strategies on Postmeal Glucose Excursions in Older Adults with Type 1 Diabetes and Hypoglycemia.Diabetes technology & therapeutics · 2026Trial
- Subcutaneous weekly semaglutide with automated insulin delivery in type 1 diabetes: a double-blind, randomized, crossover trial.Nature medicine · 2025 · on this mapTrial
- Participant Experiences of Low-Dose Empagliflozin Use as Adjunct Therapy to Hybrid Closed Loop: Findings From a Randomized Controlled Trial.Journal of diabetes science and technology · 2023Trial
- Trial
- Low-Dose Empagliflozin as Adjunct to Hybrid Closed-Loop Insulin Therapy in Adults With Suboptimally Controlled Type 1 Diabetes: A Randomized Crossover Controlled Trial.Diabetes care · 2023 · on this mapTrial
- Effect of meal composition and alcohol consumption on postprandial glucose concentration in subjects with type 1 diabetes: a randomized crossover trial.BMJ open diabetes research & care · 2021Trial
- Trial
- Artificial Pancreas: Clinical Study in Latin America Without Premeal Insulin Boluses.Journal of diabetes science and technology · 2018Trial
- Impact of erroneous meal insulin bolus with dual-hormone artificial pancreas using a simplified bolus strategy - A randomized controlled trial.Scientific reports · 2018Trial
- Artificial Pancreas and Closed-Loop Insulin Delivery: From Early Concepts to AI-Driven Diabetes Automation.Biosensors · 2026Review
- Review
- Efficacy and Safety of Stage 5 Connected Insulin Pens in Type 1 or Type 2 Diabetes: Randomized Controlled Trial Protocol (SMART-5 Study).Endocrinology and metabolism (Seoul, Korea) · 2026Article
- A Hybrid Closed-Loop Blood Glucose Control Algorithm with a Safety Limiter Based on Deep Reinforcement Learning and Model Predictive Control.Biosensors · 2026Article
- What Really Matters?: How Insulin Dose, Timing, and Distribution Relate to Meal Composition in Free-Living People with Type 1 Diabetes.Diabetes technology & therapeutics · 2025Article
- Mealtime prediction using wearable insulin pump data to support diabetes management.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- T1DiabetesGranada: a longitudinal multi-modal dataset of type 1 diabetes mellitus.Scientific data · 2023Article
- Review
- Impact on glucometric variables and quality of life of the advanced hybrid closed-loop system in pediatric and adolescent type 1 diabetes.Journal of diabetes · 2023Article
- Relative contributions of fasting and postprandial glucose increments, glycemic variability, and non-glycemic factors to HbA1c in individuals with type 1 diabetes.Journal of diabetes · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
For patients with type 1 diabetes, closed-loop delivery systems (CLS) combining an insulin pump, a glucose sensor and a dosing algorithm allowing a dynamic hormonal infusion have been shown to improve glucose control when compared with conventional therapy. Yet, reducing glucose excursion and simplification of prandial insulin doses remain a challenge. The objective of this literature review is to examine current meal-time strategies in the context of automated delivery systems in adults and children with type 1 diabetes. Current challenges and considerations for post-meal glucose control will also be discussed. Despite promising results with meal detection, the fully automated CLS has yet failed to provide comparable glucose control to CLS with carbohydrate-matched bolus in the post-meal period. The latter strategy has been efficient in controlling post-meal glucose using different algorithms and in various settings, but at the cost of a meal carbohydrate counting burden for patients. Further improvements in meal detection algorithms or simplified meal-priming boluses may represent interesting avenues. The greatest challenges remain in regards to the pharmacokinetic and dynamic profiles of available rapid insulins as well as sensor accuracy and lag-time. New and upcoming faster acting insulins could provide important benefits. Multi-hormone CLS (eg, dual-hormone combining insulin with glucagon or pramlintide) and adjunctive therapy (eg, GLP-1 and SGLT2 inhibitors) also represent promising options. Meal glucose control with the artificial pancreas remains an important challenge for which the optimal strategy is still to be determined.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.