Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28675686›Full record

ReviewDiabetes, obesity & metabolism2018

The challenges of achieving postprandial glucose control using closed-loop systems in patients with type 1 diabetes.

Véronique Gingras, Nadine Taleb, Amélie Roy-Fleming, Laurent Legault, Rémi Rabasa-Lhoret

Registry-linked trialOpen access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Diabetes, obesity & metabolism, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06546657 (An Investigation Into Diurnal Variability in Glucose Levels in Paediatric Patients With Type 1 Diabetes), which is not on this map. Cited by 51 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
51citing papers in PubMed
7.4field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06546657 completednot on this mapstarted 2021, after this paper: background citation

An Investigation Into Diurnal Variability in Glucose Levels in Paediatric Patients With Type 1 Diabetes (T1D) and Their Responses to Different Food Compositions

TypeobservationalSponsorUniversity of StirlingRan2021 to 2021Enrolled96ConditionsType 1 DiabetesArmsBreakfast
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

51 citing papers in PubMed, 104 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Trial
  10. Trial
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Véronique GingrasMetabolic Diseases Unit, Institut de Recherches Cliniques de Montréal, Montréal, Québec, Canada.ORCID 0000-0003-4918-7534
Nadine TalebMetabolic Diseases Unit, Institut de Recherches Cliniques de Montréal, Montréal, Québec, Canada.
Amélie Roy-FlemingMetabolic Diseases Unit, Institut de Recherches Cliniques de Montréal, Montréal, Québec, Canada.
Laurent LegaultMetabolic Diseases Unit, Institut de Recherches Cliniques de Montréal, Montréal, Québec, Canada.
Rémi Rabasa-LhoretMetabolic Diseases Unit, Institut de Recherches Cliniques de Montréal, Montréal, Québec, Canada.
Montreal Clinical Research Institute · CAMontreal Children's Hospital · CA

Funding

Comparison of dual-hormone artificial pancreas, single-hormone artificial pancreas, and sensor-augmented pump therapy in outpatient settingsDP3DK106930 · NIDDK · CLINICAL RESEARCH INSTITUTE OF MONTREAL · PI RABASA-LHORET, REMI · 2015 to 2015
$2.5M
NIDDK NIH HHS DP3 DK106930
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

For patients with type 1 diabetes, closed-loop delivery systems (CLS) combining an insulin pump, a glucose sensor and a dosing algorithm allowing a dynamic hormonal infusion have been shown to improve glucose control when compared with conventional therapy. Yet, reducing glucose excursion and simplification of prandial insulin doses remain a challenge. The objective of this literature review is to examine current meal-time strategies in the context of automated delivery systems in adults and children with type 1 diabetes. Current challenges and considerations for post-meal glucose control will also be discussed. Despite promising results with meal detection, the fully automated CLS has yet failed to provide comparable glucose control to CLS with carbohydrate-matched bolus in the post-meal period. The latter strategy has been efficient in controlling post-meal glucose using different algorithms and in various settings, but at the cost of a meal carbohydrate counting burden for patients. Further improvements in meal detection algorithms or simplified meal-priming boluses may represent interesting avenues. The greatest challenges remain in regards to the pharmacokinetic and dynamic profiles of available rapid insulins as well as sensor accuracy and lag-time. New and upcoming faster acting insulins could provide important benefits. Multi-hormone CLS (eg, dual-hormone combining insulin with glucagon or pramlintide) and adjunctive therapy (eg, GLP-1 and SGLT2 inhibitors) also represent promising options. Meal glucose control with the artificial pancreas remains an important challenge for which the optimal strategy is still to be determined.

Indexed as

MealsPancreas, ArtificialAdultAlgorithmsBlood GlucoseChildCombined Modality TherapyDiabetes Mellitus, Type 1Diet, DiabeticHumansHyperglycemiaHypoglycemiaPostprandial PeriodBlood Glucoseartificial pancreasclosed-loopglycaemic controlinsulin deliveryinsulin therapytype 1 diabetes

Identifiers

PMID28675686
PMCPMC5810921
OpenAlexW2728705426

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.