Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28675654›Full record

ArticleMolecular oncology2017

Bioinformatory-assisted analysis of next-generation sequencing data for precision medicine in pancreatic cancer.

Linnéa Malgerud, Johan Lindberg, Valtteri Wirta, Maria Gustafsson-Liljefors, Masoud Karimi, Carlos Fernández Moro, Katrin Stecker, Alexander Picker, Carolin Huelsewig, Martin Stein and 12 more

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Molecular oncology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02767700 (Evaluation of NGS in Combination With an Oncology Treatment Decision Support Software for Evidence-based Priorization of Individualised Treatment in Patients With Pancreatic Cancer), which is not on this map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT02767700 completednot on this map

Evaluation of NGS in Combination With an Oncology Treatment Decision Support Software for Evidence-based Priorization of Individualised Treatment in Patients With Pancreatic Cancer

TypeobservationalSponsorKarolinska University HospitalRan2016 to 2018Enrolled39ConditionsPancreatic Ductal AdenocarcinomaArmsNGS
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 22 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Engineering Precision Medicine.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2019
    Review
  10. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

22 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Linnéa MalgerudCenter for Digestive Diseases, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0002-1691-0880
Johan LindbergDepartment of Medical Epidemiology & Biostatistics (MEB), Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
Valtteri WirtaScience for Life Laboratory, Department of Microbiology, Tumor and Cell Biology (MTC), Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
Maria Gustafsson-LiljeforsDepartment of Oncology at Radiumhemmet, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden.
Masoud KarimiDepartment of Oncology at Radiumhemmet, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden.
Carlos Fernández MoroDepartment of Pathology, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden.
Katrin SteckerMolecular Health GmbH, Heidelberg, Germany.
Alexander PickerMolecular Health GmbH, Heidelberg, Germany.
Carolin HuelsewigMolecular Health GmbH, Heidelberg, Germany.
Martin SteinMolecular Health GmbH, Heidelberg, Germany.
Regina BohnertMolecular Health GmbH, Heidelberg, Germany.
Marco Del ChiaroCenter for Digestive Diseases, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden.
Stephan L HaasCenter for Digestive Diseases, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden.
Rainer L HeuchelDepartment of Clinical Sciences, Intervention and Technology (CLINTEC), Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
Johan PermertInnovation Office, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden.
Markus J MaeurerDepartment of Laboratory Medicine (LABMED), Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
Stephan BrockMolecular Health GmbH, Heidelberg, Germany.
Caroline S VerbekeDepartment of Pathology, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden.
Lars EngstrandScience for Life Laboratory, Department of Microbiology, Tumor and Cell Biology (MTC), Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
David B JacksonMolecular Health GmbH, Heidelberg, Germany.
Henrik GrönbergDepartment of Medical Epidemiology & Biostatistics (MEB), Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
Johannes Matthias LöhrCenter for Digestive Diseases, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden.
Karolinska University Hospital · SEKarolinska Institutet · SEScience for Life Laboratory · SE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) is a tumor with an extremely poor prognosis, predominantly as a result of chemotherapy resistance and numerous somatic mutations. Consequently, PDAC is a prime candidate for the use of sequencing to identify causative mutations, facilitating subsequent administration of targeted therapy. In a feasibility study, we retrospectively assessed the therapeutic recommendations of a novel, evidence-based software that analyzes next-generation sequencing (NGS) data using a large panel of pharmacogenomic biomarkers for efficacy and toxicity. Tissue from 14 patients with PDAC was sequenced using NGS with a 620 gene panel. FASTQ files were fed into treatmentmap. The results were compared with chemotherapy in the patients, including all side effects. No changes in therapy were made. Known driver mutations for PDAC were confirmed (e.g. KRAS, TP53). Software analysis revealed positive biomarkers for predicted effective and ineffective treatments in all patients. At least one biomarker associated with increased toxicity could be detected in all patients. Patients had been receiving one of the currently approved chemotherapy agents. In two patients, toxicity could have been correctly predicted by the software analysis. The results suggest that NGS, in combination with an evidence-based software, could be conducted within a 2-week period, thus being feasible for clinical routine. Therapy recommendations were principally off-label use. Based on the predominant KRAS mutations, other drugs were predicted to be ineffective. The pharmacogenomic biomarkers indicative of increased toxicity could be retrospectively linked to reported negative side effects in the respective patients. Finally, the occurrence of somatic and germline mutations in cancer syndrome-associated genes is noteworthy, despite a high frequency of these particular variants in the background population. These results suggest software-analysis of NGS data provides evidence-based information on effective, ineffective and toxic drugs, potentially forming the basis for precision cancer medicine in PDAC.

Indexed as

GenomicsHigh-Throughput Nucleotide SequencingPrecision MedicineAdultAgedAged, 80 and overAntineoplastic AgentsCarcinoma, Pancreatic DuctalFeasibility StudiesGerm-Line MutationHumansMiddle AgedMutationPancreatic NeoplasmsProspective StudiesProto-Oncogene Proteins p21(ras)Antineoplastic AgentsKRAS protein, humanProto-Oncogene Proteins p21(ras)TP53 protein, humanTumor Suppressor Protein p53bioinformaticsdrug-drug interactionsevidence-basedNGSpancreatic cancer

Identifiers

PMID28675654
PMCPMC5623817
OpenAlexW2727768576

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.