Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28675174›Full record

ReviewNature reviews. Urology2017

Landmarks in the treatment of muscle-invasive bladder cancer.

Niyati Lobo, Chloe Mount, Kawa Omar, Rajesh Nair, Ramesh Thurairaja, Muhammad Shamim Khan

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Nature reviews. Urology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 93 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
93citing papers in PubMed
9.2field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

93 citing papers in PubMed, 183 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Nanomedicine in Bladder Cancer Therapy.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024
    Review
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Integration of CD4Cancer science · 2024
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

33 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Niyati LoboDepartment of Urology, Guy's Hospital, Great Maze Pond, London, SE1 9RT, UK.
Chloe MountDepartment of Urology, Guy's Hospital, Great Maze Pond, London, SE1 9RT, UK.
Kawa OmarDepartment of Urology, Guy's Hospital, Great Maze Pond, London, SE1 9RT, UK.
Rajesh NairDepartment of Urology, Guy's Hospital, Great Maze Pond, London, SE1 9RT, UK.
Ramesh ThurairajaDepartment of Urology, Guy's Hospital, Great Maze Pond, London, SE1 9RT, UK.
Muhammad Shamim KhanDepartment of Urology, Guy's Hospital, Great Maze Pond, London, SE1 9RT, UK.
Guy's Hospital · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Muscle-invasive bladder cancer is an aggressive disease associated with high morbidity and mortality. Radical cystectomy is the mainstay of treatment and has evolved since the first reported cystectomy in 1887 to include pelvic lymph node dissection and the creation of increasingly sophisticated urinary diversions, such as neobladders and pouches, which enable patients to maintain continence. Pioneering work in the 1970s established the therapeutic activity of cisplatin in patients with bladder cancer and resulted in the introduction of cisplatin-based neoadjuvant chemotherapy, which led to the first improvement in survival outcomes in decades. Other notable advances include the development of bladder-sparing protocols, which combine surgery, chemotherapy, and radiotherapy. Molecular profiling of bladder cancer has helped to enhance our understanding of tumour biology and identify several therapeutic targets, such as programmed death (PD-1) and its ligand programmed cell death ligand 1 (PD-L1). Over the past 3 years, immune checkpoint inhibitors targeting the PD-1-PD-L1 axis have demonstrated the ability to achieve durable objective responses in trials of patients with metastatic disease. If the current momentum continues, immunotherapy is poised to change the landscape of muscle-invasive bladder cancer treatment, promising improved survival outcomes for patients with this disease.

Indexed as

Antineoplastic AgentsAntineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy ProtocolsChemotherapy, AdjuvantCisplatinCystectomyHumansLymph Node ExcisionMuscle, SmoothNeoadjuvant TherapyNeoplasm InvasivenessPelvisRadiotherapy, AdjuvantTreatment OutcomeUrinary BladderUrinary Bladder NeoplasmsAntineoplastic AgentsCisplatin

Identifiers

PMID28675174
OpenAlexW2727910366

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.