Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28675113›Full record

Observational studyJournal of intensive care medicine2019

Low Levels of Physical Activity During Critical Illness and Weaning: The Evidence-Reality Gap.

Bronwen A Connolly, Jessica L Mortimore, Abdel Douiri, Joleen W Rose, Nicholas Hart, Susan C Berney

Registry-linked trialAbstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in Journal of intensive care medicine, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03454880 (Measuring Physical Activity Levels in Critical Care), which is not on this map. Cited by 14 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03454880 completednot on this map

Measuring Physical Activity Levels in Critical Care: A Feasibility Study

TypeobservationalSponsorUniversity College, LondonRan2018 to 2018Enrolled12ConditionsCritical Care
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Guideline
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Observational
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Observational
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Bronwen A Connolly1 Lane Fox Clinical Respiratory Physiology Research Centre, London, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5676-5497
Jessica L Mortimore1 Lane Fox Clinical Respiratory Physiology Research Centre, London, United Kingdom.
Abdel Douiri6 Department of Primary Care and Public Health Science, King's College London, London, United Kingdom.
Joleen W Rose7 Physiotherapy Department, Austin Health, Heidelberg, Victoria, Australia.
Nicholas Hart1 Lane Fox Clinical Respiratory Physiology Research Centre, London, United Kingdom.
Susan C Berney4 Department of Physiotherapy, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia.

Funding

Department of Health PDF-2015-08-015
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPhysical rehabilitation can benefit critically ill patients during intensive care unit (ICU) admission, but routine clinical practice remains inconsistent nor examined in prolonged mechanical ventilation patients transferred to a specialist ventilator weaning unit (VWU). Behavioral mapping is a sampling approach that allows detailed reporting of physical activity profiles. The objective of this study was to characterize the physical activity profile of critically ill patients in a UK ICU and VWU.

methodsSingle-center, prospective observational study in a university teaching hospital. Patient observations, conducted Monday through Sunday from 08:30 am to 08:00 pm and for 1 minute every 10 minutes, included data points of patient location, people in attendance, and highest level of activity. Descriptive statistics were utilized to analyze and report data.

resultsForty-two ICU and 11 VWU patients were recruited, with 2646 and 693 observations, respectively, recorded. In the ICU, patients spent a median (interquartile range) of 100% (96%-100%) of the day (10.5 [10.0-10.5] hours) located in bed, with minimal/no activity for 99% (96%-100%) of the day (10.4 [9.7-10.5] hours). Nursing staff were most frequently observed in attendance with patients irrespective of ventilation or sedation status, although patients still spent approximately two-thirds of the day alone. Bed-to-chair transfer was the highest activity level observed. In the VWU, patients spent 94% (73%-100%) of the day (9.9 [7.7-10.5] hours) in bed and 56% (43%-60%) of time alone. Physical activity levels were higher and included ambulation. All physical activities occurred during physical rehabilitation sessions.

conclusionsThese profiles of low physical activity behavior across both patients in the ICU and VWU highlight the need for targeted strategies to improve levels beyond therapeutic rehabilitation and support for a culture shift toward providing patients with, and engaging them in, a multidisciplinary, multiprofessional environment that optimizes overall physical activity.

Indexed as

Critical IllnessEvidence-Based PracticeExerciseFemaleHumansIntensive Care UnitsMaleMiddle AgedPhysical Therapy ModalitiesProspective StudiesRespiration, ArtificialVentilator Weaningbehaviorcritical illnessintensive care unitphysical activityweaning unit

Identifiers

PMID28675113
PMCPMC6716208

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.