Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28675023›Full record

ArticleCancer research and treatment2018

Comparison of Native Escherichia coli L-Asparaginase versus Pegylated Asparaginase, in Combination with Ifosfamide, Methotrexate, Etoposide, and Prednisolone, in Extranodal NK/T-Cell Lymphoma, Nasal Type.

Hyun Jee Kim, Chan-Young Ock, Tae Min Kim, Sung Hee Lee, Ju-Yeun Lee, Sun Hoi Jung, Yoon Sook Cho, Miso Kim, Bhumsuk Keam, Dong-Wan Kim and 2 more

Open access · diamondAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Cancer research and treatment, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Antibodies Predict Pegaspargase Allergic Reactions and Failure of Rechallenge.Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology · 2019
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Hyun Jee KimDepartment of Pharmacy, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Korea.
Chan-Young OckDepartment of Internal Medicine, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Korea.
Tae Min KimDepartment of Internal Medicine, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Korea.
Sung Hee LeeDepartment of Pharmacy, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Korea.
Ju-Yeun LeeCollege of Pharmacy and Institute of Pharmaceutical Science and Technology, Hanyang University, Guri, Korea.
Sun Hoi JungDepartment of Pharmacy, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Korea.
Yoon Sook ChoDepartment of Pharmacy, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Korea.
Miso KimDepartment of Internal Medicine, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Korea.
Bhumsuk KeamDepartment of Internal Medicine, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Korea.
Dong-Wan KimDepartment of Internal Medicine, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Korea.
Il Han KimDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Korea.
Dae Seog HeoDepartment of Internal Medicine, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Korea.
Seoul National University Hospital · KRHanyang University Guri Hospital · KR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThe aim of this study was to compare asparaginase-related toxicities in two asparaginase preparations, namely native Escherichia coli L-asparaginase (L-ASP) and pegylated asparaginase (PEG-ASP) in combination with ifosfamide, methotrexate, etoposide, and prednisolone (IMEP) in natural killer (NK)/T-cell lymphoma (NTCL). MATERIALS AND

methodsA total of 41 NTCL patients who received IMEP plus native E. coli L-ASP or PEG-ASP at Seoul National University Hospital were included in this study between January 2013 and March 2016. IMEP/ASP treatment consisted of ifosfamide, methotrexate, etoposide, plus native E. coli L-ASP (6,000 IU/m2 on days 1, 3, 5, 7, 9, and 11) or PEG-ASP (2,500 IU/m2 on day 1) every 3 weeks. ASP-related toxicities, toxicity patterns, length of hospital stay, and clinical outcomes were compared between the different treatment groups.

resultsThe frequency of ASP-related toxicities was similar between the IMEP plus native E. coli L-ASP group and the PEG-ASP group apart from hypofibrinogenemia (native E. coli L-ASP vs. PEG-ASP group, 86.4% vs. 36.8%; p=0.001). Although post-treatment transaminase and albumin levels were significantly high and low, respectively, hepatotoxicity gradients before and after treatment did not differ significantly between the groups. Since PEG-ASP was given at an outpatient clinic in some patients, length of hospital stay was significantly shorter in the IMEP plus PEG-ASP group (median, 4.0 vs. 6.0 days; p=0.002). A favorable tendency of clinical outcomes was observed in NTCL patients treated with IMEP plus PEG-ASP (complete remission rate, 73.7% vs. 45.5%; p=0.067).

conclusionIMEP plus PEG-ASP showed similar ASP-related toxicities, shorter length of hospital stay, and a trend towards improved clinical outcomes compared with IMEP plus native E. coli L-ASP in NTCL.

Indexed as

AgedAntineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy ProtocolsAsparaginaseEscherichia coliEtoposideFemaleHumansIfosfamideLength of StayLymphoma, Extranodal NK-T-CellMaleMethotrexateMiddle AgedPolyethylene GlycolsPrednisoloneTreatment OutcomeAsparaginaseEtoposideIfosfamideMethotrexatepegaspargasePolyethylene GlycolsPrednisoloneLength of stayNative Escherichia coli L-asparaginaseNK/T-cell lymphomaPegylated asparaginaseToxicity

Identifiers

PMID28675023
PMCPMC6056977
OpenAlexW2728788724

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.