Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28674975›Full record

ArticleJournal of neuro-oncology2017

Elderly patients with newly diagnosed glioblastoma: can preoperative imaging descriptors improve the predictive power of a survival model?

Mina Park, Seung-Koo Lee, Jong Hee Chang, Seok-Gu Kang, Eui Hyun Kim, Se Hoon Kim, Mi Kyung Song, Bo Gyoung Ma, Sung Soo Ahn

Abstract readValidation Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of neuro-oncology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Mina ParkDepartment of Radiology, Research Institute of Radiological Science, Yonsei University College of Medicine, 50 Yonsei-ro, Seodaemun-gu, 120-752, Seoul, South Korea.
Seung-Koo LeeDepartment of Radiology, Research Institute of Radiological Science, Yonsei University College of Medicine, 50 Yonsei-ro, Seodaemun-gu, 120-752, Seoul, South Korea.
Jong Hee ChangDepartment of Neurosurgery, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea.
Seok-Gu KangDepartment of Neurosurgery, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea.
Eui Hyun KimDepartment of Neurosurgery, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea.
Se Hoon KimDepartment of Pathology, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea.
Mi Kyung SongBiostatistics Collaboration Unit, Department of Research Affairs, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea.
Bo Gyoung MaBiostatistics Collaboration Unit, Department of Research Affairs, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea.
Sung Soo AhnDepartment of Radiology, Research Institute of Radiological Science, Yonsei University College of Medicine, 50 Yonsei-ro, Seodaemun-gu, 120-752, Seoul, South Korea. sungsoo@yuhs.ac.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0503-5558

Funding

National Research Foundation of Korea 2014R1A1A1002716
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to identify independent prognostic factors among preoperative imaging features in elderly glioblastoma patients and to evaluate whether these imaging features, in addition to clinical features, could enhance the predictive power of survival models. This retrospective study included 108 patients ≥65 years of age with newly diagnosed glioblastoma. Preoperative clinical features (age and KPS), postoperative clinical features (extent of surgery and postoperative treatment), and preoperative MRI features were assessed. Univariate and multivariate cox proportional hazards regression analyses for overall survival were performed. The integrated area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (iAUC) was calculated to evaluate the added value of imaging features in the survival model. External validation was independently performed with 40 additional patients ≥65 years of age with newly diagnosed glioblastoma. Eloquent area involvement, multifocality, and ependymal involvement on preoperative MRI as well as clinical features including age, preoperative KPS, extent of resection, and postoperative treatment were significantly associated with overall survival on univariate Cox regression. On multivariate analysis, extent of resection and ependymal involvement were independently associated with overall survival and preoperative KPS showed borderline significance. The model with both preoperative clinical and imaging features showed improved prediction of overall survival compared to the model with preoperative clinical features (iAUC, 0.670 vs. 0.600, difference 0.066, 95% CI 0.021-0.121). Analysis of the validation set yielded similar results (iAUC, 0.790 vs. 0.670, difference 0.123, 95% CI 0.021-0.260), externally validating this observation. Preoperative imaging features, including eloquent area involvement, multifocality, and ependymal involvement, in addition to clinical features, can improve the predictive power for overall survival in elderly glioblastoma patients.

Indexed as

Magnetic Resonance ImagingAgedArea Under CurveBrainBrain NeoplasmsFemaleGlioblastomaHumansMaleMultivariate AnalysisPreoperative PeriodPrognosisRetrospective StudiesROC CurveSurvival AnalysisAgedGlioblastomaMagnetic resonance imagingPrognosisSurvival analysis

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.