Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28674967›Full record

ArticleEuropean radiology2017

Adverse events during CT colonography for screening, diagnosis and preoperative staging of colorectal cancer: a Japanese national survey.

Koichi Nagata, Ken Takabayashi, Takaaki Yasuda, Michiaki Hirayama, Shungo Endo, Ryoichi Nozaki, Takenobu Shimada, Hidenori Kanazawa, Masanori Fujiwara, Norihito Shimizu and 3 more

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in European radiology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 29 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Guideline
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. CT colonography: revisited after 30 years.Insights into imaging · 2025
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 10 institutions in 1 country.

Koichi NagataCommittee for Quality Assessment of Colorectal Cancer Screening, Japanese Society of Gastrointestinal Cancer Screening, Tokyo, Japan. Nagata7@aol.com.
Ken TakabayashiGastrointestinal Advanced Imaging Academy, Tochigi, Japan.
Takaaki YasudaGastrointestinal Advanced Imaging Academy, Tochigi, Japan.
Michiaki HirayamaGastrointestinal Advanced Imaging Academy, Tochigi, Japan.
Shungo EndoGastrointestinal Advanced Imaging Academy, Tochigi, Japan.
Ryoichi NozakiCommittee for Quality Assessment of Colorectal Cancer Screening, Japanese Society of Gastrointestinal Cancer Screening, Tokyo, Japan.
Takenobu ShimadaCommittee for Quality Assessment of Colorectal Cancer Screening, Japanese Society of Gastrointestinal Cancer Screening, Tokyo, Japan.
Hidenori KanazawaDivision of Screening Technology, Centre for Public Health Sciences, National Cancer Centre, 5-1-1, Tsukiji, Chuo-ku, Tokyo, 104-0045, Japan.
Masanori FujiwaraGastrointestinal Advanced Imaging Academy, Tochigi, Japan.
Norihito ShimizuGastrointestinal Advanced Imaging Academy, Tochigi, Japan.
Tatema IwatsukiGastrointestinal Advanced Imaging Academy, Tochigi, Japan.
Teruaki IwanoGastrointestinal Advanced Imaging Academy, Tochigi, Japan.
Hiroshi SaitoCommittee for Quality Assessment of Colorectal Cancer Screening, Japanese Society of Gastrointestinal Cancer Screening, Tokyo, Japan.
National Cancer Centre Japan · JPFukushima Medical University · JPJapan Cancer Society · JPJA Shizuoka Koseiren ENSHU hospital · JPJichi Medical University · JPKajima Corporation (Japan) · JPKameda Medical Center · JPKensei Hospital, TokushimaTakano Hospital · JPTonan Hospital · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesTo retrospectively evaluate the frequencies and magnitudes of adverse events associated with computed tomographic colonography (CTC) for screening, diagnosis and preoperative staging of colorectal cancer.

methodsA Japanese national survey on CTC was administered by use of an online survey tool in the form of a questionnaire. The questions covered mortality, colorectal perforation, vasovagal reaction, total number of examinations, and examination procedures. The survey data was collated and raw frequencies were determined. Fisher's exact test was used to determine differences in event rates between groups.

resultsAt 431 institutions, 147,439 CTC examinations were performed. No deaths were reported. Colorectal perforations occurred in 0.014% (21/147,439): 0.003% (1/29,823) in screening, 0.014% (13/91,007) in diagnosis and 0.028% (7/25,330) in preoperative staging. The perforation risk was significantly lower in screening than in preoperative staging CTC procedures (p = 0.028). Eighty-one per cent of perforation cases (17/21) did not require emergency surgery. Vasovagal reaction occurred in 0.081% (120/147,439): 0.111% (33/29,823) in screening, 0.088% (80/91,007) in diagnosis and 0.028% (7/25,330) in preoperative staging.

conclusionsThe risk of colorectal perforation and vasovagal reaction in CTC is low. The frequency of colorectal perforation associated with CTC is least in the screening group and greatest in the preoperative-staging group. KEY POINTS: • The colorectal perforation rate during preoperative-staging CTC was 0.028 %. • The perforation rates for screening and diagnosis were 0.003 % and 0.014 %, respectively. • The perforation risk is significantly lower in screening than in preoperative staging. • Eighty-one per cent of perforation cases did not require emergency surgery. • Use of an automatic colon insufflator can reduce the risk of bowel perforation.

Indexed as

Colonography, Computed TomographicColonoscopyColorectal NeoplasmsFemaleHumansInsufflationIntestinal PerforationMaleMass ScreeningNeoplasm StagingRetrospective StudiesSyncope, VasovagalColonographyComputed tomographyIntestinal perforationVasovagal syncopeVirtual colonoscopy

Identifiers

PMID28674967
OpenAlexW2730323252

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.