Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28674939›Full record

ArticleMedicine, health care, and philosophy2018

The Care Dialog: the "ethics of care" approach and its importance for clinical ethics consultation.

Patrick Schuchter, Andreas Heller

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Medicine, health care, and philosophy, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. From Care to Justice: Reframing Nursing Education Through Relational Ethics and Epistemic Inclusion.Nursing philosophy : an international journal for healthcare professionals · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Pain Management in Farm Animals: Focus on Cattle, Sheep and Pigs.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2021
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Patrick SchuchterInstitute of Palliative Care and Organisational Ethics, IFF Faculty of Interdisciplinary Studies, Alpen-Adria Universität Klagenfurt | Wien | Graz, Schottenfeldgasse 29/4, 1070, Vienna, Austria. patrick.schuchter@aau.at.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5471-9251
Andreas HellerInstitute of Palliative Care and Organisational Ethics, IFF Faculty of Interdisciplinary Studies, Alpen-Adria Universität Klagenfurt | Wien | Graz, Schottenfeldgasse 29/4, 1070, Vienna, Austria.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Ethics consultation in institutions of the healthcare system has been given a standard form based on three pillars: education, the development of guidelines and concrete ethics consultation in case conferences. The spread of ethics committees, which perform these tasks on an organizational level, is a remarkable historic achievement. At the same time it cannot be denied that modern ethics consultation neglects relevant aspects of care ethics approaches. In our essay we present an "ethics of care" approach as well as an empirical pilot project-"Ethics from the bottom up"-which organizes ethics consultation based on this focus. Findings and philosophy of the project will be discussed as far as relevant for ethics consultation in the healthcare system.

Indexed as

Ethics ConsultationDecision MakingDelivery of Health CareEmergenciesEmotionsHumansMoralsNursing HomesPatient CarePhilosophy, MedicalPilot ProjectsAdvance Care PlanningArt of livingCareCare of the selfDialogEthicsEthics ConsultationHealth care ethicsMoral case deliberationNarrative ethicsOrganizational ethicsSocratic Dialogue

Identifiers

PMID28674939
PMCPMC5814518

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.