Trial reportInternational ophthalmology2018
Self-made cryopreservative fibrin glue applied in pterygium surgery: a novel practical technique.
Trial report in International ophthalmology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.
- Autologous fibrin glue versus sutures for conjunctival autograft in primary pterygium: a randomized clinical trial.International ophthalmology · 2023Trial
- Intermittent sliding-lock-knot suture for limbal conjunctival autograft fixation in pterygium surgery: a technique note.International journal of ophthalmology · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
purposeTo introduce a novel practical technique of self-made cryopreservative fibrin glue (SMC) applied in pterygium surgery and to assess its safety and efficacy.
methodsForty-eight eyes of 48 patients with nasal primary pterygium were enrolled. The patients were equally assigned to 6 groups. Self-made fibrin glue was subpackaged and, respectively, cryopreserved for 3, 7, 15 days and 1, 2 and 3 months. At each time point, the asepsis of SMC was confirmed by bacterial culture and colony counting. In each group, corresponding SMC was applied to fix the autograft after the pterygium was removed (e.g., SMC 3d for group 1 and SMC 3m for group 6). All the patients were followed up postoperatively on days 1, 3, 7 and 14 and then at months 1, 3, 6. The main outcome measures included fixation success rate within two tries, postoperative discomfort, recurrence rate and complications.
resultsNo colony growth was observed in all the fibrinogen and thrombin tubes sent. Five patients needed a second try with respective SMC during the autograft fixation, and there were no significant differences in SMC use times among the groups (P = 0.885). There were no significant differences in postoperative discomfort (day 1, 3, 7; P = 0.651, P = 0.269, P = 0.180, respectively) among the groups. By the end of 6-m follow-up, no infections and severe complications were observed in any group. The total recurrence rate was 3/48 (6%), and there were no significant differences in recurrences among the groups (P = 1.000).
conclusionSMC is safe and effective for autograft fixation in pterygium surgery. This new practical technique will benefit the patients and surgeons in developing and underdeveloped country.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.