Review3 Biotech2017
Current perspectives on genetically modified crops and detection methods.
Review in 3 Biotech, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
18 citing papers in PubMed, 78 citations in OpenAlex.
- Specific detection of genetically modified potatoes containingGM crops & food · 2025Article
- Development and Validation of Multiplex-PCR Assay forPlants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Quantitative and qualitative analysis of three DNA extraction methods from soybean, maize, and canola oils and investigation of the presence of genetically modified organisms (GMOs).Food chemistry. Molecular sciences · 2024Article
- Application of next-generation sequencing in the detection of transgenic crop.Frontiers in genetics · 2024Review
- A rapid and high-throughput system for the detection of transgenic products based on LAMP-CRISPR-Cas12a.Current research in food science · 2023Article
- Digital PCR-Based Characterization of aFoods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
- Genetically Modified Soybean Detection Using a Biosensor Electrode with a Self-Assembled Monolayer of Gold Nanoparticles.Biosensors · 2022Article
- Genetically engineered crops for sustainably enhanced food production systems.Frontiers in plant science · 2022Review
- Genome Editing: A Promising Approach for Achieving Abiotic Stress Tolerance in Plants.International journal of genomics · 2022Review
- Review
- Development of a sensitive monoclonal antibody-based sandwich ELISA to detect Vip3Aa in genetically modified crops.Biotechnology letters · 2020Article
- Nanotechnological interventions for plant health improvement and sustainable agriculture.3 Biotech · 2020Review
- Structural Aspects of DNA Repair and Recombination in Crop Improvement.Frontiers in genetics · 2020Review
- EngineeringFrontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2020Article
- An Interdisciplinary Approach to Study the Performance of Second-generation Genetically Modified Crops in Field Trials: A Case Study With Soybean and Wheat Carrying the Sunflower HaHB4 Transcription Factor.Frontiers in plant science · 2020Article
- Transgenic crops for the agricultural improvement in Pakistan: a perspective of environmental stresses and the current status of genetically modified crops.GM crops & food · 2020Review
- Comparative Proteomics of Phytase-transgenic Maize Seeds Indicates Environmental Influence is More Important than that of Gene Insertion.Scientific reports · 2019Article
- Production of Marker-Free Apple Plants Expressing the Supersweet Protein Gene Driven by Plant Promoter.Frontiers in plant science · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Genetically modified (GM) crops are the fastest adopted commodities in the agribiotech industry. This market penetration should provide a sustainable basis for ensuring food supply for growing global populations. The successful completion of two decades of commercial GM crop production (1996-2015) is underscored by the increasing rate of adoption of genetic engineering technology by farmers worldwide. With the advent of introduction of multiple traits stacked together in GM crops for combined herbicide tolerance, insect resistance, drought tolerance or disease resistance, the requirement of reliable and sensitive detection methods for tracing and labeling genetically modified organisms in the food/feed chain has become increasingly important. In addition, several countries have established threshold levels for GM content which trigger legally binding labeling schemes. The labeling of GM crops is mandatory in many countries (such as China, EU, Russia, Australia, New Zealand, Brazil, Israel, Saudi Arabia, Korea, Chile, Philippines, Indonesia, Thailand), whereas in Canada, Hong Kong, USA, South Africa, and Argentina voluntary labeling schemes operate. The rapid adoption of GM crops has increased controversies, and mitigating these issues pertaining to the implementation of effective regulatory measures for the detection of GM crops is essential. DNA-based detection methods have been successfully employed, while the whole genome sequencing using next-generation sequencing (NGS) technologies provides an advanced means for detecting genetically modified organisms and foods/feeds in GM crops. This review article describes the current status of GM crop commercialization and discusses the benefits and shortcomings of common and advanced detection systems for GMs in foods and animal feeds.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.