Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28674841›Full record

ArticleJournal of medical systems2017

A Novel Smartphone Accelerometer Application for Low-Intensity Activity and Energy Expenditure Estimations in Overweight and Obese Adults.

Sylvie Rousset, Romain Guidoux, Ludivine Paris, Nicolas Farigon, Magalie Miolanne, Clément Lahaye, Martine Duclos, Yves Boirie, Damien Saboul

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of medical systems, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. How to Measure Sedentary Behavior at Work?Frontiers in public health · 2019
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Sylvie RoussetUniversité Clermont Auvergne, INRA, UNH, Unité de Nutrition Humaine, 63000, Clermont-Ferrand, France. sylvie.rousset@inra.fr.
Romain GuidouxUniversité Clermont Auvergne, INRA, UNH, Unité de Nutrition Humaine, 63000, Clermont-Ferrand, France.
Ludivine ParisUniversité Clermont Auvergne, INRA, UNH, Unité de Nutrition Humaine, 63000, Clermont-Ferrand, France.
Nicolas FarigonCHU Clermont Ferrand, Service Nutrition Clinique, 63003, Clermont Ferrand, France.
Magalie MiolanneCHU Clermont Ferrand, Service Nutrition Clinique, 63003, Clermont Ferrand, France.
Clément LahayeCHU Clermont Ferrand, Service Nutrition Clinique, 63003, Clermont Ferrand, France.
Martine DuclosUniversité Clermont Auvergne, INRA, UNH, Unité de Nutrition Humaine, 63000, Clermont-Ferrand, France.
Yves BoirieUniversité Clermont Auvergne, INRA, UNH, Unité de Nutrition Humaine, 63000, Clermont-Ferrand, France.
Damien SaboulAlmerys, 46 rue du Ressort, 63967, Clermont-Ferrand Cedex 9, France.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Physical inactivity and sedentary behaviors are on the rise worldwide and contribute to the current overweight and obesity scourge. The loss of healthy life style benchmarks and the lack of the need to move make it necessary to provide feedback about physical and sedentary activities in order to promote active ways of life. The aim of this study was to develop a specific function adapted to overweight and obese people to identify four physical activity (PA) categories and to estimate the associated total energy expenditure (TEE). This function used accelerometry data collected from a smartphone to evaluate activity intensity and length, and TEE. The performance of the proposed function was estimated according to two references (Armband® and FitmatePro®) under controlled conditions (CC) for a 1.5-h scenario, and to the Armband® device in free-living conditions (FLC) over a 12-h monitoring period. The experiments were carried out with overweight and obese volunteers: 13 in CC and 27 in FLC. The evaluation differences in time spent in each category were lower than 7% in CC and 6% in FLC, in comparison to the Armband® and FitmatePro® references. The TEE mean gap in absolute value between the function and the two references was 9.3% and 11.5% in CC, and 8.5% according to Armband® in FLC.

Indexed as

ObesityOverweightAccelerometryAdultEnergy MetabolismHumansMotor ActivitySmartphoneAccelerometryActivity estimationEnergy expenditureMobilityObeseSmartphone

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.