Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28674821›Full record

ArticleAnalytical and bioanalytical chemistry2017

The analysis of tetracyclines, quinolones, macrolides, lincosamides, pleuromutilins, and sulfonamides in chicken feathers using UHPLC-MS/MS in order to monitor antibiotic use in the poultry sector.

Larissa J M Jansen, Yvette J C Bolck, Janneau Rademaker, Tina Zuidema, Bjorn J A Berendsen

Open access · hybridAbstract readValidation Study
In one paragraph

Article in Analytical and bioanalytical chemistry, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 43 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Larissa J M JansenRIKILT, Wageningen University and Research, Akkermaalsbos 2, 6708WB, P.O. Box 230, 6700 AE, Wageningen, The Netherlands. larissa.jansen@wur.nl.
Yvette J C BolckRIKILT, Wageningen University and Research, Akkermaalsbos 2, 6708WB, P.O. Box 230, 6700 AE, Wageningen, The Netherlands.
Janneau RademakerRIKILT, Wageningen University and Research, Akkermaalsbos 2, 6708WB, P.O. Box 230, 6700 AE, Wageningen, The Netherlands.
Tina ZuidemaRIKILT, Wageningen University and Research, Akkermaalsbos 2, 6708WB, P.O. Box 230, 6700 AE, Wageningen, The Netherlands.
Bjorn J A BerendsenRIKILT, Wageningen University and Research, Akkermaalsbos 2, 6708WB, P.O. Box 230, 6700 AE, Wageningen, The Netherlands.
Wageningen University & Research · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In The Netherlands, all antibiotic treatments should be registered at the farm and in a central database. To enforce correct antibiotic use and registration, and to enforce prudent use of antibiotics, there is a need for methods that are able to detect antibiotic treatments. Ideally, such a method is able to detect antibiotic applications during the entire lifespan of an animal, including treatments administered during the first days of the animals' lives. Monitoring tissue, as is common practice, only provides a limited window of opportunity, as residue levels in tissue soon drop below measurable quantities. The analysis of feathers proves to be a promising tool in this respect. Furthermore, a qualitative confirmatory method was developed for the analyses of six major groups of antibiotics in ground chicken feathers, aiming for a detection limit as low as reasonably possible. The method was validated according to Commission Decision 2002/657/EC. All compounds comply with the criteria and, as a matter of fact, 58% of the compounds could also be quantified according to regulations. Additionally, we demonstrated that a less laborious method, in which whole feathers were analyzed, proved successful in the detection of applied antibiotics. Most compounds could be detected at levels of 2 μg kg

Indexed as

PoultryAnimalsAnti-Bacterial AgentsChromatography, High Pressure LiquidDiterpenesFeathersLimit of DetectionLincosamidesMacrolidesPleuromutilinsPolycyclic CompoundsQuinolonesSulfonamidesTandem Mass SpectrometryTetracyclinesAnti-Bacterial AgentsDiterpenesLincosamidesMacrolidesPleuromutilinsPolycyclic CompoundsQuinolonesSulfonamidesTetracyclinesAntibioticsFeathersLC-MS/MSMonitoringValidation

Identifiers

PMID28674821
PMCPMC5534202
OpenAlexW2733397763

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.