ArticleeNeuro
Distinct Correlation Structure Supporting a Rate-Code for Sound Localization in the Owl's Auditory Forebrain.
Article in eNeuro. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.
- Auditory Competition and Stimulus Selection across Spatial Locations from Midbrain to Forebrain in Barn Owls.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2024Article
- Auditory Competition and Coding of Relative Stimulus Strength across Midbrain Space Maps of Barn Owls.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2024Article
- Barn owls specialized sound-driven behavior: Lessons in optimal processing and coding by the auditory system.Hearing research · 2024Review
- The continued importance of comparative auditory research to modern scientific discovery.Hearing research · 2023Review
- Investigating the representation of uncertainty in neuronal circuits.PLoS computational biology · 2021Article
- Synthesis of Hemispheric ITD Tuning from the Readout of a Neural Map: Commonalities of Proposed Coding Schemes in Birds and Mammals.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2019Article
- Neural Maps of Interaural Time Difference in the American Alligator: A Stable Feature in Modern Archosaurs.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2019Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
While a topographic map of auditory space exists in the vertebrate midbrain, it is absent in the forebrain. Yet, both brain regions are implicated in sound localization. The heterogeneous spatial tuning of adjacent sites in the forebrain compared to the midbrain reflects different underlying circuitries, which is expected to affect the correlation structure, i.e., signal (similarity of tuning) and noise (trial-by-trial variability) correlations. Recent studies have drawn attention to the impact of response correlations on the information readout from a neural population. We thus analyzed the correlation structure in midbrain and forebrain regions of the barn owl's auditory system. Tetrodes were used to record in the midbrain and two forebrain regions, Field L and the downstream auditory arcopallium (AAr), in anesthetized owls. Nearby neurons in the midbrain showed high signal and noise correlations (R
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.