Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28674694›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in medicine2017

Visualization of Global Disease Burden for the Optimization of Patient Management and Treatment.

Winfried Schlee, Deborah A Hall, Niklas K Edvall, Berthold Langguth, Barbara Canlon, Christopher R Cederroth

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in medicine, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
2.1field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 26 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Screening for Circulating Inflammatory Proteins Does Not Reveal Plasma Biomarkers of Constant Tinnitus.Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology : JARO · 2023
    Pooled it
  2. Low Evidence for Tinnitus Risk Factors: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology : JARO · 2023
    Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Association between Hyperacusis and Tinnitus.Journal of clinical medicine · 2020
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Sex-Specific Association of Tinnitus With Suicide Attempts.JAMA otolaryngology-- head & neck surgery · 2019
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.

Winfried SchleeDepartment for Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, University Hospital Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany.
Deborah A HallNational Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Nottingham Biomedical Research Centre, Nottingham, United Kingdom.
Niklas K EdvallExperimental Audiology, Department of Physiology and Pharmacology, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
Berthold LangguthDepartment for Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, University Hospital Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany.
Barbara CanlonExperimental Audiology, Department of Physiology and Pharmacology, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
Christopher R CederrothExperimental Audiology, Department of Physiology and Pharmacology, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
Karolinska Institutet · SEUniversity Hospital Regensburg · DENational Institute for Health Research · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe assessment and treatment of complex disorders is challenged by the multiple domains and instruments used to evaluate clinical outcome. With the large number of assessment tools typically used in complex disorders comes the challenge of obtaining an integrative view of disease status to further evaluate treatment outcome both at the individual level and at the group level. Radar plots appear as an attractive visual tool to display multivariate data on a two-dimensional graphical illustration. Here, we describe the use of radar plots for the visualization of disease characteristics applied in the context of tinnitus, a complex and heterogeneous condition, the treatment of which has shown mixed success.

methodsData from two different cohorts, the Swedish Tinnitus Outreach Project (STOP) and the Tinnitus Research Initiative (TRI) database, were used. STOP is a population-based cohort where cross-sectional data from 1,223 non-tinnitus and 933 tinnitus subjects were analyzed. By contrast, the TRI contained data from 571 patients who underwent various treatments and whose Clinical Global Impression (CGI) score was accessible to infer treatment outcome. In the latter, 34,560 permutations were tested to evaluate whether a particular ordering of the instruments could reflect better the treatment outcome measured with the CGI.

resultsRadar plots confirmed that tinnitus subtypes such as occasional and chronic tinnitus from the STOP cohort could be strikingly different, and helped appreciate a gender bias in tinnitus severity. Radar plots with greater surface areas were consistent with greater burden, and enabled a rapid appreciation of the global distress associated with tinnitus in patients categorized according to tinnitus severity. Permutations in the arrangement of instruments allowed to identify a configuration with minimal variance and maximized surface difference between CGI groups from the TRI database, thus affording a means of optimally evaluating the outcomes in individual patients.

conclusionWe anticipate such a tool to become a starting point for more sophisticated measures in clinical outcomes, applicable not only in the context of tinnitus but also in other complex diseases where the integration of multiple variables is needed for a comprehensive evaluation of treatment response.

Indexed as

diagnostic testsdisease progressiongender differencespatient managementsubtypingtreatment outcometreatment responsevalue-based decision-making

Identifiers

PMID28674694
PMCPMC5475418
OpenAlexW2675567739

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.