Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28674348›Full record

Trial reportInternal medicine (Tokyo, Japan)2017

Randomized Trial Comparing Esomeprazole and Rabeprazole in First-line Eradication Therapy for Helicobacter pylori Infection based on the Serum Levels of Pepsinogens.

Tadashi Shimoyama, Daisuke Chinda, Yoshihiko Sawada, Kazuo Komai, Hironobu Chiba, Yoshiharu Saito, Yoshio Sasaki, Masashi Matsuzaka, Shinsaku Fukuda

Open access · diamondAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Internal medicine (Tokyo, Japan), 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 23% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Influence ofFrontiers in pharmacology · 2021
    Review
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Tadashi ShimoyamaDepartment of Gastroenterology, Hirosaki University Graduate School of Medicine, Japan.
Daisuke ChindaDepartment of Gastroenterology, Hirosaki University Graduate School of Medicine, Japan.
Yoshihiko SawadaSawada Clinic of Internal Medicine, Japan.
Kazuo KomaiKomai Clinic of Gastroenterology and Internal Medicine, Japan.
Hironobu ChibaSasaki Clinic of Gastroenterology and Internal Medicine, Japan.
Yoshiharu SaitoChiba Clinic of Gastroenterology and Internal Medicine, Japan.
Yoshio SasakiShinjo Clinic of Gastroenterology and Internal Medicine, Japan.
Masashi MatsuzakaDepartment of Cancer Epidemiology and Community Health, Hirosaki University Hospital, Japan.
Shinsaku FukudaDepartment of Gastroenterology, Hirosaki University Graduate School of Medicine, Japan.
Hirosaki University · JPChiba Hospital · JPHirosaki University Hospital · JPSasaki Institute · JPYamagata Prefectural Shinjo Hospital · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective CYP2C19 metabolic activity influences the efficacy of Helicobacter pylori eradication therapies comprising PPIs. Rabeprazole (RPZ) and esomeprazole (EPZ) are PPIs not extensively metabolized by CYP2C19. The aim of this study was to elucidate whether or not first-line triple therapies using RPZ or EPZ are equally effective in Japanese patients with different CYP2C19 genotypes. Methods Two-hundred patients infected with H. pylori were randomized to receive one of the following regimens: amoxicillin (750 mg), clarithromycin (200 mg), and either esomeprazole (20 mg) (EAC group) or rabeprazole (10 mg) (RAC group), twice a day for one week. The CYP2C19 polymorphisms were determined by polymerase chain reaction and the serum level of pepsinogens was measured. Results The eradication rates of the EAC and RAC regimens were 79.8% (95% confidential interval: 71.7-89.0%) and 74.7% (66.0-83.4%), respectively, in a per protocol (PP) analysis (p=0.488). The eradication rates of the EAC and RAC regimens were not significantly different between patients with the homo EM genotype (p=0.999) or hetero IM or PM genotypes (p=0.286). A lower PG I/II ratio was associated with lower eradication rates (p=0.025). Conclusion Although the eradication rate was less than 80%, the EAC and RAC regimens were equally effective in each CYP2C19 genotype group. The PG I/II ratio was associated with the results of EAC and RAC therapy in this series of patients.

Indexed as

AdultAmoxicillinAnti-Bacterial AgentsAsian PeopleClarithromycinCytochrome P-450 CYP2C19Drug Therapy, CombinationEsomeprazoleFemaleGenotypeHelicobacter InfectionsHelicobacter pyloriHumansJapanMaleMiddle AgedAmoxicillinAnti-Bacterial AgentsClarithromycinCytochrome P-450 CYP2C19EsomeprazoleProton Pump InhibitorsRabeprazoleCYP2C19eradicationHelicobacter pyloripepsinogen

Identifiers

PMID28674348
PMCPMC5519461
OpenAlexW2725428814

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.