ArticleBMJ open2017
Methods, applications, interpretations and challenges of interrupted time series (ITS) data: protocol for a scoping review.
Article in BMJ open, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Types of Interventions Targeting Dietary, Physical Activity, and Weight-Related Outcomes among University Students: A Systematic Review of Systematic Reviews.Advances in nutrition (Bethesda, Md.) · 2019Pooled it
- Suicides Mortality of Unemployed Individuals Becomes a Serious Public Health Concern in Japan in Post-COVID-19 Pandemic Era.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2025Article
- The trend of poisonings before and after the COVID-19 pandemic.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Optimized segmented regression models for the transition period of intervention effects.Global health research and policy · 2023Article
- Impact of the COVID-19 Pandemic on Opioid Overdose Deaths: a Spatiotemporal Analysis.Journal of urban health : bulletin of the New York Academy of Medicine · 2022Article
- The Impact of the COVID-19 Pandemic on Antibiotic Prescribing Trends in Outpatient Care: A Nationwide, Quasi-Experimental Approach.Antibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Article
- The value of intentional self-care practices: The effects of mindfulness on improving job satisfaction, teamwork, and workplace environments.Archives of psychiatric nursing · 2021Article
- Article
- Introducing an innovative model of acute paediatric mental health and addictions care to paediatric emergency departments: a protocol for a multicentre prospective cohort study.BMJ open quality · 2020Article
- MultiCenter Interrupted Time Series Analysis: Incorporating Within and Between-Center Heterogeneity.Clinical epidemiology · 2020Article
- Methods, Applications and Challenges in the Analysis of Interrupted Time Series Data: A Scoping Review.Journal of multidisciplinary healthcare · 2020Article
- Article
- Sample size and power considerations for ordinary least squares interrupted time series analysis: a simulation study.Clinical epidemiology · 2019Article
- Health-Related Social Needs Following Onset of the COVID-19 Pandemic in Oregon.Annals of family medicineArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesInterrupted time series (ITS) design involves collecting data across multiple time points before and after the implementation of an intervention to assess the effect of the intervention on an outcome. ITS designs have become increasingly common in recent times with frequent use in assessing impact of evidence implementation interventions. Several statistical methods are currently available for analysing data from ITS designs; however, there is a lack of guidance on which methods are optimal for different data types and on their implications in interpreting results. Our objective is to conduct a scoping review of existing methods for analysing ITS data, to summarise their characteristics and properties, as well as to examine how the results are reported. We also aim to identify gaps and methodological deficiencies. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: We will search electronic databases from inception until August 2016 (eg, MEDLINE and JSTOR). Two reviewers will independently screen titles, abstracts and full-text articles and complete the data abstraction. The anticipated outcome will be a summarised description of all the methods that have been used in analysing ITS data in health research, how those methods were applied, their strengths and limitations and the transparency of interpretation/reporting of the results. We will provide summary tables of the characteristics of the included studies. We will also describe the similarities and differences of the various methods. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Ethical approval is not required for this study since we are just considering the methods used in the analysis and there will not be identifiable patient data. Results will be disseminated through open access peer-reviewed publications.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.