Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28674057›Full record

ArticleAntimicrobial agents and chemotherapy2017

Population Pharmacokinetics and Dose Optimization of Teicoplanin during Venoarterial Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation.

Jin Wi, Hayeon Noh, Kyoung Lok Min, Seungwon Yang, Byung Hak Jin, Jongsung Hahn, Soo Kyung Bae, Jiseon Kim, Min Soo Park, Donghoon Choi and 1 more

Registry-linked trialOpen access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Antimicrobial agents and chemotherapy, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02581280 (Population Pharmacokinetics of Teicoplanin, Levofloxacin, Piperacillin/Tazobactam, Meropenem, Vancomycin, Remifentanil, Cefepime, Cefpirome, Sufentanil, Midazolam, Clopidogrel, Ticagrelor, Prasugrel During Veno-arterial Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation), which is not on this map. Cited by 18 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 22% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT02581280 completednot on this map

Population Pharmacokinetics of Teicoplanin, Levofloxacin, Piperacillin/Tazobactam, Meropenem, Vancomycin, Remifentanil, Cefepime, Cefpirome, Sufentanil, Midazolam, Clopidogrel, Ticagrelor, Prasugrel During Veno-arterial Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation (VA ECMO)

TypeobservationalSponsorYonsei UniversityRan2014 to 2019Enrolled56ConditionsCardiac DysfunctionArmsResidual blood
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 27 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Pharmacokinetics of Teicoplanin in a Patient with Coronavirus Disease 2019 Receiving Veno-venous Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation.Journal of critical care medicine (Universitatea de Medicina si Farmacie din Targu-Mures) · 2022
    Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Effects ofFrontiers in medicine · 2021
    Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Jin WiDivision of Cardiology, Department of Internal Medicine, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Hayeon NohDepartment of Pharmacy and Yonsei Institute of Pharmaceutical Sciences, College of Pharmacy, Yonsei University, Incheon, Republic of Korea.
Kyoung Lok MinDepartment of Pharmaceutical Medicine and Regulatory Sciences, Colleges of Medicine and Pharmacy, Yonsei University, Incheon, Republic of Korea.
Seungwon YangDepartment of Pharmacy and Yonsei Institute of Pharmaceutical Sciences, College of Pharmacy, Yonsei University, Incheon, Republic of Korea.
Byung Hak JinDepartment of Pharmaceutical Medicine and Regulatory Sciences, Colleges of Medicine and Pharmacy, Yonsei University, Incheon, Republic of Korea.
Jongsung HahnDepartment of Pharmacy and Yonsei Institute of Pharmaceutical Sciences, College of Pharmacy, Yonsei University, Incheon, Republic of Korea.
Soo Kyung BaeCollege of Pharmacy, The Catholic University of Korea, Bucheon, Republic of Korea.
Jiseon KimCollege of Pharmacy, The Catholic University of Korea, Bucheon, Republic of Korea.
Min Soo ParkDepartment of Pharmaceutical Medicine and Regulatory Sciences, Colleges of Medicine and Pharmacy, Yonsei University, Incheon, Republic of Korea.
Donghoon ChoiDivision of Cardiology, Department of Internal Medicine, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Min Jung ChangDepartment of Pharmacy and Yonsei Institute of Pharmaceutical Sciences, College of Pharmacy, Yonsei University, Incheon, Republic of Korea mjchang@yonsei.ac.kr.
Yonsei University · KRCatholic University of Korea · KRSeverance Hospital · KR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The pharmacokinetics (PK) of drugs are known to be significantly altered in patients receiving extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO). However, clinical studies of the PK of drugs administered during ECMO are scarce, and the proper dosing adjustment has yet to be established. We developed a population PK model for teicoplanin, investigated covariates influencing teicoplanin exposure, and suggested an optimal dosing regimen for ECMO patients. Samples for PK analysis were collected from 10 adult patients, and a population PK analysis and simulations were performed to identify an optimal teicoplanin dose needed to provide a >50% probability of target attainment at 72 h using a trough concentration target of >10 μg/ml for mild to moderate infections and a trough concentration target of >15 μg/ml for severe infections. Teicoplanin was well described by a two-compartment PK model with first-order elimination. The presence of ECMO was associated with a lower central volume of distribution, and continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT) was associated with a higher peripheral volume of distribution. For mild to moderate infections, an optimal dose was a loading dose (LD) of 600 mg and a maintenance dose (MD) of 400 mg for ECMO patients not receiving CRRT and an LD of 800 mg and an MD of 600 mg for those receiving CRRT. For severe infections, an optimal dose was an LD of 1,000 mg and an MD of 800 mg for ECMO patients not receiving CRRT and an LD of 1,200 mg and an MD of 1,000 mg for those receiving CRRT. In conclusion, doses higher than the standard doses are needed to achieve fast and appropriate teicoplanin exposure during ECMO. (This study has been registered at ClinicalTrials.gov under identifier NCT02581280.).

Indexed as

Extracorporeal Membrane OxygenationAdultAgedAnti-Bacterial AgentsCritical IllnessFemaleHeart Valve DiseasesHumansMaleMiddle AgedMonte Carlo MethodMycosesMyocardial InfarctionMyocarditisProspective StudiesRenal Replacement TherapyAnti-Bacterial AgentsTeicoplanincardiogenic shockextracorporeal membrane oxygenationpharmacokineticspopulation pharmacokineticsteicoplanin

Identifiers

PMID28674057
PMCPMC5571348
OpenAlexW2729977681

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.