Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28674013›Full record

ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2017

Global priorities for conservation across multiple dimensions of mammalian diversity.

Fernanda T Brum, Catherine H Graham, Gabriel C Costa, S Blair Hedges, Caterina Penone, Volker C Radeloff, Carlo Rondinini, Rafael Loyola, Ana D Davidson

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 62 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
62citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

62 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Informing spatial conservation prioritization with species' traits.Conservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology · 2026
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Conservation priorities for functionally unique and specialized terrestrial vertebrates threatened by biological invasions.Conservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology · 2025
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Accounting for functionality in the identification of global conservation priorities: promises and pitfalls.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2025
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. The influence of scale-dependent geodiversity on species distribution models in a biodiversity hotspot.Philosophical transactions. Series A, Mathematical, physical, and engineering sciences · 2024
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

2 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Fernanda T BrumConservation Biogeography Laboratory, Departamento de Ecologia, Universidade Federal de Goiás, 74680-900 Goiania, Brasil; ftbrum@gmail.com.ORCID 0000-0003-4415-6130
Catherine H GrahamDepartment of Ecology and Evolution, Stony Brook University, NY 11794.
Gabriel C CostaDepartment of Biology, Auburn University at Montgomery, Montgomery AL 36124.
S Blair HedgesCenter for Biodiversity, Temple University, Philadelphia, PA 19122.
Caterina PenoneInstitute of Plant Sciences, University of Bern, 3013 Bern, Switzerland.
Volker C RadeloffSILVIS Lab, Department of Forest and Wildlife Ecology, University of Wisconsin-Madison, WI 53706.
Carlo RondininiGlobal Mammal Assessment Program, Department of Biology and Biotechnologies, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome 00185, Italy.
Rafael LoyolaConservation Biogeography Laboratory, Departamento de Ecologia, Universidade Federal de Goiás, 74680-900 Goiania, Brasil.ORCID 0000-0001-5323-2735
Ana D DavidsonDepartment of Ecology and Evolution, Stony Brook University, NY 11794.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Conservation priorities that are based on species distribution, endemism, and vulnerability may underrepresent biologically unique species as well as their functional roles and evolutionary histories. To ensure that priorities are biologically comprehensive, multiple dimensions of diversity must be considered. Further, understanding how the different dimensions relate to one another spatially is important for conservation prioritization, but the relationship remains poorly understood. Here, we use spatial conservation planning to (

Indexed as

BiodiversityConservation of Natural ResourcesAnimalsBiological EvolutionEcosystemEndangered SpeciesGeographyMammalsPhylogenycomplementarityphylogenetic dimensionspatial conservation prioritizationtaxonomic dimensiontrait dimension

Identifiers

PMID28674013
PMCPMC5530698

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.