Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28674011›Full record

ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2017

Elucidating reaction mechanisms on quantum computers.

Markus Reiher, Nathan Wiebe, Krysta M Svore, Dave Wecker, Matthias Troyer

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 83 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
83citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

83 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Utility-Scale Quantum Computational Chemistry.The journal of physical chemistry letters · 2026
    Review
  6. Mixed-PrecisionJournal of chemical theory and computation · 2026
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. How to Use Quantum Computers for Biomolecular Free Energies.Journal of chemical theory and computation · 2026
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

23 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Markus ReiherLaboratorium für Physikalische Chemie, ETH Zurich, 8093 Zurich, Switzerland.
Nathan WiebeStation Q Quantum Architectures and Computation Group, Microsoft Research, Redmond, WA 98052.
Krysta M SvoreStation Q Quantum Architectures and Computation Group, Microsoft Research, Redmond, WA 98052.
Dave WeckerStation Q Quantum Architectures and Computation Group, Microsoft Research, Redmond, WA 98052.
Matthias TroyerStation Q Quantum Architectures and Computation Group, Microsoft Research, Redmond, WA 98052; mtroyer@microsoft.com.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

With rapid recent advances in quantum technology, we are close to the threshold of quantum devices whose computational powers can exceed those of classical supercomputers. Here, we show that a quantum computer can be used to elucidate reaction mechanisms in complex chemical systems, using the open problem of biological nitrogen fixation in nitrogenase as an example. We discuss how quantum computers can augment classical computer simulations used to probe these reaction mechanisms, to significantly increase their accuracy and enable hitherto intractable simulations. Our resource estimates show that, even when taking into account the substantial overhead of quantum error correction, and the need to compile into discrete gate sets, the necessary computations can be performed in reasonable time on small quantum computers. Our results demonstrate that quantum computers will be able to tackle important problems in chemistry without requiring exorbitant resources.

Indexed as

quantum algorithmsquantum computingreaction mechanisms

Identifiers

PMID28674011
PMCPMC5530650

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.