Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28673992›Full record

ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2017

Quantification of habitat fragmentation reveals extinction risk in terrestrial mammals.

Kevin R Crooks, Christopher L Burdett, David M Theobald, Sarah R B King, Moreno Di Marco, Carlo Rondinini, Luigi Boitani

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 113 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
113citing papers in PubMed
28.2field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

113 citing papers in PubMed, 527 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

53 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.

Kevin R CrooksDepartment of Fish, Wildlife, and Conservation Biology, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO 80523; kevin.crooks@colostate.edu.
Christopher L BurdettDepartment of Biology, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO 80523.
David M TheobaldConservation Science Partners, Fort Collins, CO 80524.
Sarah R B KingNatural Resource Ecology Laboratory, Department of Ecosystem Science and Sustainability, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO 80523.
Moreno Di MarcoARC Centre of Excellence for Environmental Decisions, School of Biological Sciences, The University of Queensland, QLD 4072, Brisbane, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-8902-4193
Carlo RondininiGlobal Mammal Assessment Program, Department of Biology and Biotechnologies, Sapienza Università di Roma, I-00185 Rome, Italy.
Luigi BoitaniGlobal Mammal Assessment Program, Department of Biology and Biotechnologies, Sapienza Università di Roma, I-00185 Rome, Italy.
Colorado State University · USSapienza University of Rome · ITConservation Science Partners · USThe University of Queensland · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Although habitat fragmentation is often assumed to be a primary driver of extinction, global patterns of fragmentation and its relationship to extinction risk have not been consistently quantified for any major animal taxon. We developed high-resolution habitat fragmentation models and used phylogenetic comparative methods to quantify the effects of habitat fragmentation on the world's terrestrial mammals, including 4,018 species across 26 taxonomic Orders. Results demonstrate that species with more fragmentation are at greater risk of extinction, even after accounting for the effects of key macroecological predictors, such as body size and geographic range size. Species with higher fragmentation had smaller ranges and a lower proportion of high-suitability habitat within their range, and most high-suitability habitat occurred outside of protected areas, further elevating extinction risk. Our models provide a quantitative evaluation of extinction risk assessments for species, allow for identification of emerging threats in species not classified as threatened, and provide maps of global hotspots of fragmentation for the world's terrestrial mammals. Quantification of habitat fragmentation will help guide threat assessment and strategic priorities for global mammal conservation.

Indexed as

Conservation of Natural ResourcesEcosystemExtinction, BiologicalAnimalsBiodiversityBody SizeClimate ChangeGeographyMammalsPhylogenyRisk AssessmentSpecies Specificityconservationextinction riskhabitat fragmentationmammals

Identifiers

PMID28673992
PMCPMC5530695
OpenAlexW2730257002

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.