Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28673987›Full record

ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2017

Diatom centromeres suggest a mechanism for nuclear DNA acquisition.

Rachel E Diner, Chari M Noddings, Nathan C Lian, Anthony K Kang, Jeffrey B McQuaid, Jelena Jablanovic, Josh L Espinoza, Ngocquynh A Nguyen, Miguel A Anzelmatti, Jakob Jansson and 5 more

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 34 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
34citing papers in PubMed
3.7field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

34 citing papers in PubMed, 78 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Rachel E DinerIntegrative Oceanography Division, Scripps Institution of Oceanography, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA 92037.
Chari M NoddingsSynthetic Biology and Bioenergy Group, J. Craig Venter Institute, La Jolla, CA 92037.
Nathan C LianSynthetic Biology and Bioenergy Group, J. Craig Venter Institute, La Jolla, CA 92037.
Anthony K KangSynthetic Biology and Bioenergy Group, J. Craig Venter Institute, La Jolla, CA 92037.
Jeffrey B McQuaidIntegrative Oceanography Division, Scripps Institution of Oceanography, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA 92037.
Jelena JablanovicMicrobial and Environmental Genomics Group, J. Craig Venter Institute, La Jolla, CA 92037.
Josh L EspinozaMicrobial and Environmental Genomics Group, J. Craig Venter Institute, La Jolla, CA 92037.
Ngocquynh A NguyenSynthetic Biology and Bioenergy Group, J. Craig Venter Institute, La Jolla, CA 92037.
Miguel A AnzelmattiMicrobial and Environmental Genomics Group, J. Craig Venter Institute, La Jolla, CA 92037.
Jakob JanssonSynthetic Biology and Bioenergy Group, J. Craig Venter Institute, La Jolla, CA 92037.
Vincent A BielinskiSynthetic Biology and Bioenergy Group, J. Craig Venter Institute, La Jolla, CA 92037.
Bogumil J KarasSynthetic Biology and Bioenergy Group, J. Craig Venter Institute, La Jolla, CA 92037.
Christopher L DupontMicrobial and Environmental Genomics Group, J. Craig Venter Institute, La Jolla, CA 92037.
Andrew E AllenIntegrative Oceanography Division, Scripps Institution of Oceanography, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA 92037.
Philip D WeymanSynthetic Biology and Bioenergy Group, J. Craig Venter Institute, La Jolla, CA 92037 pweyman@jcvi.org.ORCID 0000-0001-5787-0291
J. Craig Venter Institute · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Centromeres are essential for cell division and growth in all eukaryotes, and knowledge of their sequence and structure guides the development of artificial chromosomes for functional cellular biology studies. Centromeric proteins are conserved among eukaryotes; however, centromeric DNA sequences are highly variable. We combined forward and reverse genetic approaches with chromatin immunoprecipitation to identify centromeres of the model diatom

Indexed as

Cell NucleusCentromereCentromere Protein AChromatin ImmunoprecipitationChromosomesDiatomsDNAMycoplasma mycoidesPlasmidsCentromere Protein ADNACENH3centromerediatomepisomePhaeodactylum tricornutum

Identifiers

PMID28673987
PMCPMC5530661
OpenAlexW2732481151

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.